2008
DOI: 10.2172/922600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational Wave Detection with Atom Interferometry

Abstract: We propose two distinct atom interferometer gravitational wave detectors, one terrestrial and another satellite-based, utilizing the core technology of the Stanford 10 m atom interferometer presently under construction. The terrestrial experiment can operate with strain sensitivity ∼ . Each configuration compares two widely separated atom interferometers run using common lasers. The effect of the gravitational waves on the propagating laser field produces the main effect in this configuration and enables a lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[65], the nanotube reaches μ ¼ 14.0 (assuming a fringe visibility of 0.8 and coherence time of 100 oscillator periods). By this measure, the superposition is more macroscopic than already achieved in state-of-the-art near-field molecular interferometry experiments [66] (μ ¼ 12.1) or in a micromembrane near the ground state [17] (μ ¼ 11.5), and it is comparable to other proposals, including a satellite-based atom interferometer [67] (μ ¼ 14.5) or a 10 5 amu Talbot-Lau interferometer [68] (μ ¼ 14.5). However, because of its low mass, a nanotube has a lower measure than proposals for superpositions of a micromirror [9] (μ ¼ 19.0) or nanosphere interference [10] (μ ¼ 20.5) [69].…”
Section: Nanomechanical Interferometrysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[65], the nanotube reaches μ ¼ 14.0 (assuming a fringe visibility of 0.8 and coherence time of 100 oscillator periods). By this measure, the superposition is more macroscopic than already achieved in state-of-the-art near-field molecular interferometry experiments [66] (μ ¼ 12.1) or in a micromembrane near the ground state [17] (μ ¼ 11.5), and it is comparable to other proposals, including a satellite-based atom interferometer [67] (μ ¼ 14.5) or a 10 5 amu Talbot-Lau interferometer [68] (μ ¼ 14.5). However, because of its low mass, a nanotube has a lower measure than proposals for superpositions of a micromirror [9] (μ ¼ 19.0) or nanosphere interference [10] (μ ¼ 20.5) [69].…”
Section: Nanomechanical Interferometrysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Obviously we will describe the most probable options based on the currently known technologies. For this reason we will neglect (although they may be scientifically interesting) some new solutions like atom-interferometers [80] and also QND techniques [81] which hold a high potential for lowering quantum noise but still need to be experimentally proven.…”
Section: Scenarios For the Third Generation Gw Observatoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article we expand on a previous article [4], giving the details of our proposal for an Atomic Gravitational wave Interferometric Sensor (AGIS). We develop proposals for two experiments, one terrestrial, the other satellitebased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%