2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1063773711050069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational stability and dynamical overheating of galactic stellar disks

Abstract: We use the marginal stability condition for galactic disks and the stellar velocity dispersion data published by different authors to place upper limits on the disk local surface density at two radial scalelengths R = 2h. Extrapolating these estimates, we constrain the total mass of the disks and compare these estimates to those based on the photometry and color of stellar populations.The comparison reveals that the stellar disks of most of spiral galaxies in our sample cannot be substantially overheated and a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 corresponds to a model galaxy with different parameters of the disc and spherical subsystem. The figure includes our modelling of the objects studied by Mikhailova et al (2001) and Zasov et al (1991) in addition to results of the present paper. The upper curve corresponds to mostly bulgeless models.…”
Section: Relative Thickness Of Stellar Disc Versus Relative Mass Of Smentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 corresponds to a model galaxy with different parameters of the disc and spherical subsystem. The figure includes our modelling of the objects studied by Mikhailova et al (2001) and Zasov et al (1991) in addition to results of the present paper. The upper curve corresponds to mostly bulgeless models.…”
Section: Relative Thickness Of Stellar Disc Versus Relative Mass Of Smentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Relation between the vertical scale height, local disc surface density and spheroidal subsystem mass M s enables us to include the disc thickness into the modelling. At the same time, if the velocity dispersion is close to that required for the marginal disc stability, the thickness of the stellar disc is tightly connected with the spherical-to-disc components mass ratio (Zasov et al 1991;Mikhailova et al 2001;Sotnikova & Rodionov 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, since the relative thickness of the disc depends on the contribution of the spherical component ('bulge+dark halo') (h/z0 ∝ M dark /M total ; Zasov, Makarov & Mikhailova 1991;Zasov et al 2002, see also the discussion in MSR10 and , this means that the relative contribution of the spherical component does not vary systematically along the morphological Hubble sequence of bright spiral galaxies. In turn, since bulges contribute more to the mass of the spherical component in the early-type disc galaxies, the dark halos themselves should reveal higher mass fraction in the case of the late-type (mostly bulgeless) galaxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the obtained disk masses with the photometric estimates we calculated disk mass-to-light ratios in B band (M/L B ) d . For Sa-S0 galaxies the contribution of bulge was taken into account (for more details see Zasov et al 2011).…”
Section: The Results Of Disk Mass Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%