2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational signatures of lunar floor-fractured craters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high ratio of intrusive to extrusive material has parallels in the smaller floor fractured craters that are common on the Moon (Jozwiak et al, 2017(Jozwiak et al, , 2015Thorey et al, 2015). We note that the gravity anomaly in the northeast quadrant of the Outer Rook likely includes some contribution from the extrusive Lacus Veris mare.…”
Section: Gravity Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The high ratio of intrusive to extrusive material has parallels in the smaller floor fractured craters that are common on the Moon (Jozwiak et al, 2017(Jozwiak et al, , 2015Thorey et al, 2015). We note that the gravity anomaly in the northeast quadrant of the Outer Rook likely includes some contribution from the extrusive Lacus Veris mare.…”
Section: Gravity Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Crater counts at the crater Tsiolkovsky indeed indicates that mare lavas were erupted soon after crater formation (Mouginis-Mark & Boyce, 2017). On the Moon, complex craters in the Highlands generally show negative Bouguer gravity anomalies independently of their age and intermediate-sized craters seem only partially compensated (Reindler & Arkani-Hamed, 2001;Soderblom et al, 2015;Thorey et al, 2015), suggesting that the crust can support the stress caused by unloading over a timescale longer than 10 8 years. This one depends on the lithosphere thermal state but is particularly large for the Moon, larger than for the Earth, because of its small radius (Zhang & Zuber, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This range represents the two endmember assumptions made, either pure intrusions due to post-magma ocean igneous activity, or material that originated in the mantle. Floor-fractured craters (Jozwiak et al, 2012(Jozwiak et al, , 2015(Jozwiak et al, , 2016Thorey et al, 2015) and other structures also provide evidence for shallow magmatic intrusions and sill formation, though they do not provide specific constraints on the fractional volume of intrusives in the lunar crust more generally. This end-member interpretation is tested against the model results by assuming that the modeled mean +2 fraction range of intrusive material should not exceed 100%, but with the preferred result that the modeled mean +1σ fraction of intrusive material should not exceed the expected range obtained from remote sensing (Crites and Lucey, 2015) of 45%.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Inversion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%