2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational signal propagation in the double pulsar studied with the MeerKAT telescope

Abstract: The Double Pulsar, PSR J0737−3039A/B, has offered a wealth of gravitational experiments in the strong-field regime, all of which general relativity has passed with flying colours. In particular, among current gravity experiments that test photon propagation, the Double Pulsar probes the strongest spacetime curvature. Observations with MeerKAT and, in future, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) can greatly improve the accuracy of current tests and facilitate tests of next-to-leading-order (NLO) contributions in bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the companion mass we derive, we infer that the second SN of the PSR J1946+2052 system is likely similar to that of the double pulsar system. Ferdman et al (2013) did not find obvious profile evolution of PSR J0737-3039A from 2005-2011, confirmed more recently by Hu et al (2022). The reason why we nevertheless observe profile evolution in PSR J1946+2052 is likely that our line of sight is closer to the edge of the circular emission beam than that in PSR J0737-3039A; thus, the variation of the peak separation is significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on the companion mass we derive, we infer that the second SN of the PSR J1946+2052 system is likely similar to that of the double pulsar system. Ferdman et al (2013) did not find obvious profile evolution of PSR J0737-3039A from 2005-2011, confirmed more recently by Hu et al (2022). The reason why we nevertheless observe profile evolution in PSR J1946+2052 is likely that our line of sight is closer to the edge of the circular emission beam than that in PSR J0737-3039A; thus, the variation of the peak separation is significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…15a, we see that the profile variation due to the bending is insignificant for a pulsar−black hole binary with 𝑖 = 89.7 • . This also explains the null detection of the bending induced profile variation for the double pulsar for which 𝑖 = 89.35 • or 90.65 • (Hu et al 2022).…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Similar to the Shapiro delay (another manifestation of the spacetime curvature around the companion), the total bending delay is also stronger for edge-on systems, especially at the orbital phases near the superior conjunction. So, it might be difficult to decouple these delays (Hu et al 2022). However, the value of the Shapiro delay depends only on the masses of the pulsar and the companions as well as the orbital parameters, e.g., 𝑒, 𝑃 𝑏 , 𝑖, 𝜔, and 𝐴 𝑇 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the rotation of A has been confirmed to be prograde using the modulation of B's emission by the interaction with A's pulsar wind [94]. The unique high inclination angle between the orbital angular momentum and the line of sight towards the pulsar system (i = 89.36 • ± 0.03 • or 180 • − i from timing analysis) enabled the studies of an aberrational light bending effect [58,79], thus independently confirming the prograde rotation of A and providing additional evidence for a low-kick SN.…”
Section: Measuring the Lt Precession Via Pulsar Timingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A schematic comparison of these compact binary systems with the the Hulse-Taylor pulsar PSR B1913+16 and the Sun is shown in Figure 6. [78], J0737−3039 [79], J1757−1854 [34], J1946+2052 [80], and J1141−6545 [75]) compared to the size of the Sun. The left orbit of each pair corresponds to the pulsar, whereas the right orbit corresponds to the companion (pulsar A and pulsar B in the case of the Double Pulsar).…”
Section: Measuring the Lt Precession Via Pulsar Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%