2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.11677
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational radiation condition at infinity with a positive cosmological constant

Francisco Fernández-Álvarez,
José M. M. Senovilla

Abstract: Gravitational waves have been directly detected and astronomical observations indicate that our Universe has a positive cosmological constant Λ. Nevertheless, a theoretical gaugeinvariant notion of gravitational waves arriving at infinity (escaping from the space-time) in the presence of a positive Λ has been elusive. We find the answer to this long-standing gravitational puzzle, and present a geometric, gauge-invariant radiation condition at infinity.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also (being an energy current) generate a 'Magnus'-like force on spinning test bodies [62]. The super-Poynting vector is likewise believed to accompany gravitational radiation [11][12][13][14][15][16], and, in stationary settings such as those in figure 6, where (similarly to its EM counterpart) it circulates around in closed loops, observable consequences have been sought, namely an attempted link to frame-dragging 22 [63]. 21 Indeed p a looks very strange sometimes.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It should also (being an energy current) generate a 'Magnus'-like force on spinning test bodies [62]. The super-Poynting vector is likewise believed to accompany gravitational radiation [11][12][13][14][15][16], and, in stationary settings such as those in figure 6, where (similarly to its EM counterpart) it circulates around in closed loops, observable consequences have been sought, namely an attempted link to frame-dragging 22 [63]. 21 Indeed p a looks very strange sometimes.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ϑ = π 2 , and retrieve from (133) and ( 134) that (87) and ( 88) is valid, such that ρ g increases with |ϕ| = ψ Σ ; for i = 1(u 2 = u 3 = 0), however, we have ψ Σ = 0: for all values of ϕ = γ the observers (132) with i = 1 belong to Σ, are thus principal (P a = 0), and have the same minimal super-energy density ρ 1 g (ϕ) = ξ, in agreement with characterizations ( j) and (d) of principal observers. This amends the statement at the end of section 5 of [26] when applied to Petrov type D. 15 In the Petrov type I case the special observers (132) may be characterized as follows. For an arbitrary observer u a given by (97) the orthogonal eigendirections of the endomorphism Q associated to an observer u a are generated by the three vectors x a i given in (99).…”
Section: Petrov Type I: General Vs Principal Observersmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations