1964
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.136.b1224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

54
2,418
2
10

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,261 publications
(2,526 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
54
2,418
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains why the thin and thick lines corresponding to the initial and final histograms coincide for q < 0.1. The gravitationalwave inspiral time is inversely proportional to the binary's symmetric mass ratio η = q/(1 + q) 2 [60], making it hard to preserve accuracy over long PN time evolutions for q < 0.1. However, Schnittman [20] showed that spinorbit resonances only become important inside a "resonance locking" radius r lock /M ≈ [(1 + q 2 )/(1 − q 2 )] 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This explains why the thin and thick lines corresponding to the initial and final histograms coincide for q < 0.1. The gravitationalwave inspiral time is inversely proportional to the binary's symmetric mass ratio η = q/(1 + q) 2 [60], making it hard to preserve accuracy over long PN time evolutions for q < 0.1. However, Schnittman [20] showed that spinorbit resonances only become important inside a "resonance locking" radius r lock /M ≈ [(1 + q 2 )/(1 − q 2 )] 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although dynamical friction damped the orbital eccentricity at the large separations of the Dotti et al simulations [17], after the formation of a circumbinary disk the orbital eccentricity again grows to a limiting value e crit ≃ 0.7 [59]. Gravitational radiation circularizes the binary after it decouples from the circumbinary disk [60], but the binary could still have considerable residual eccentricity e LISA ∝ M −0.73 q −1.2 when the frequency of the fundamental GW harmonic reaches f LISA = 10 −4 Hz [59,61]. We will neglect residual eccentricity during the inspiral and any effects it might have on PN spin alignment.…”
Section: Spin Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation reaction reduces eccentricity during the inspiral of a binary compact object, as shown by the postNewtonian calculation by Peters [16]. Using the quadrupole approximation, Peters derived the evolution of the orbital eccentricity during the inspiral caused by the emission of gravitational waves.…”
Section: Behavior Of Eccentricity During Inspiralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the inspiral of an isolated binary, the orbit circularizes via the emission of gravitational waves [16,17]. As a result, even binaries starting with some eccentricity at the beginning of their stellar evolution are expected to have negligible eccentricity by the time the frequency of the emitted gravitational radiation enters the frequency band of ground based detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the gravitational radiation causes the orbits of isolated binary systems to circularize [52,53], we will consider only the PN-inspirals in quasicircular orbits with masses m i (i = 1, 2) and (the magnitude of) spins S i that are (anti-)aligned and normal to the orbital plane, but they have an arbitrary mass ratio. (All throughout, we use geometric units, where G = c = 1, with the useful conversion factor 1M ⊙ = 1.477 km = 4.926 × 10 −6 s.) In this adiabatic setup, the GW phase of the dominant harmonic is twice the orbital phase [20].…”
Section: Goals and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%