2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.99.104029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational mass of composite systems

Abstract: The equivalence principle in combination with the special relativistic equivalence between mass and energy, E = mc 2 , is one of the cornerstones of general relativity. However, for composite systems a long-standing result in general relativity asserts that the passive gravitational mass is not simply equal to the total energy. This seeming anomaly is supported by all explicit derivations of the dynamics of bound systems, and is only avoided after time-averaging. Here we rectify this misconception and derive f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation ( 5 ) then becomes the relativistic Schrödinger equation and the state may be interpreted as the state of the center-of-mass and internal clock of the particle at the time t , interpreted as the time of an inertial frame observing the particle with respect to which the center-of-mass degrees of freedom are defined. With this identification, the dynamics implied by the Page–Wootters formalism is in agreement with previous descriptions of a relativistic particle with internal degrees of freedom 19 , 31 , 39 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Equation ( 5 ) then becomes the relativistic Schrödinger equation and the state may be interpreted as the state of the center-of-mass and internal clock of the particle at the time t , interpreted as the time of an inertial frame observing the particle with respect to which the center-of-mass degrees of freedom are defined. With this identification, the dynamics implied by the Page–Wootters formalism is in agreement with previous descriptions of a relativistic particle with internal degrees of freedom 19 , 31 , 39 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…'proper time' and 'redshift'); e.g. [3][4][5][6][7][8]. We emphasised in the introduction and also in our discussion of the Equivalence Principle that answers to the fundamental question of gravity-matter coupling in Quantum Mechanics should not be based on a priori restricted states that imply a semi-classical behaviour of some of the (factorising) degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As emphasised above, this generalisation serves not only a point of principal interest that deserves clarification, but is also of immediate practical interest, not only in the obvious realm of quantum optics experiments regarding the detection of gravitational waves, but also in atom interferometry; see, e.g. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. A calculation using methods very similar to those of [1] including external gravitational fields was performed by Marzlin already in 1995 [9] 2 ; but unlike Sonnleitner and Barnett in [1] or our calculation in this work, Marzlin did not perform a full first-order post-Newtonian expansion and instead focused on the electric dipole coupling only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we consider a set of N relativistic quantum particles in a weak gravitational field, each of which has a quantum state living in the tensor product Hibert space of position/momentum and some internal "clock" Hilbert space (see Refs. [52,43] for a similar analysis in a different context). In this timeless formulation, the global state of the N particles is "frozen", but the dynamical evolution is recovered in terms of the relational variables to one of the particles, which is chosen as the QRF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%