2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.106.076004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of the proton: Connections between distributions in 2D and 3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As listed in Table 2, those proton mechanical quantities are compared with other existing theoretical results. As shown in Table 2, our statements on the pressure density differ from the findings in previous studies considerably [7,8,[45][46][47]. In fact, the quark contribution to the pressure is bigger than most of those reported previously, regardless of the gluon contribution.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As listed in Table 2, those proton mechanical quantities are compared with other existing theoretical results. As shown in Table 2, our statements on the pressure density differ from the findings in previous studies considerably [7,8,[45][46][47]. In fact, the quark contribution to the pressure is bigger than most of those reported previously, regardless of the gluon contribution.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The calculation of the mechanical radius is consistent with the results reporetd in Refs. [3,8,[45][46][47], subjected to the error margin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive GFF model studies for the nucleon and other hadrons were presented in light-front constituent quark models (Pasquini and Boffi, 2007;Sun and Dong, 2020), diquark approaches (Chakrabarti et al, 2020;Choudhary et al, 2022;Fu et al, 2022;Hwang and Mueller, 2008;Kumar et al, 2017), holographic AdS/QCD models Carlson, 2008, 2009;Brodsky and de Teramond, 2008;Chakrabarti et al, 2015;Fujita et al, 2022;Mamo and Zahed, 2020Mondal, 2016;Mondal et al, 2016), a large-N c bag model (Lorcé et al, 2022b;Neubelt et al, 2020), a cloudy bag model (Owa et al, 2022), light-cone QCD sum rules (Aliev et al, 2021;Anikin, 2019;Özdem, 2020, 2021;Özdem and Azizi, 2020), the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model (Freese et al, 2019), chiral quark-soliton model with strange and heavier quarks (Ghim et al, 2022;Won et al, 2022), a dual model with complex Regge trajectories (Fiore et al, 2021), and in an instant-form relativistic impulse approximation approach Troitsky, 2021, 2022). Algebraic GPD Ansätze were used to shed light on pion and kaon GFFs (Raya et al, 2022) and toy models (Kim et al, 2022a) as well as light-cone convo-lution models (Freese and Cosyn, 2022a) were used to study the deuteron GFFs.…”
Section: B Gffs In Model Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the Galilean symmetry in the light-front framework, such 2D distributions are fully relativistic. A connection between the 2D and 3D distributions can be obtained in terms of Abel transformation [28,29]. The gravitational form factors have been extensively studied for the nucleon with various models namely the simple multi-pole model [22], the chiral quark soliton model [30][31][32], the Bag model [33], the Skyrme model [34,35], AdS/QCD motivated diquark model [36], in chiral perturbation theory [37][38][39], and in Lattice QCD [40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%