1994
DOI: 10.1029/94wr00533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravel saltation: 1. Experiments

Abstract: Laboratory observations of the saltation of natural gravel particles in a steep, movable‐bed channel are reported. Standard video‐imaging techniques were used to measure and analyze particle motion. The saltation of gravel particles is described in terms of statistical properties of particle trajectories, such as mean values and standard deviations of saltation length, height, and streamwise particle velocity. The results obtained are compared with available empirical data, and a general good agreement is obta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
170
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
25
170
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(52), whereas the resulting equation is then solved for 1 − dU dV (V s ) −1 -this is the term involving dU/dV which we need to compute L s in Eq. (44). In this manner, we finally obtain a closed expression for the saturation length, which we present and discuss in the next subsection.…”
Section: A Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(52), whereas the resulting equation is then solved for 1 − dU dV (V s ) −1 -this is the term involving dU/dV which we need to compute L s in Eq. (44). In this manner, we finally obtain a closed expression for the saturation length, which we present and discuss in the next subsection.…”
Section: A Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more detailed analysis, particle momentum balance, and in particular relaxation effects involving, e.g., particle inertia (Parker, 1975;Charru, 2006), should be included. In so far as a step length generally consists of many individual particle saltations (Nino et al, 1994), however, the present kinematic formulation may be sufficient for a firstorder analysis. One other way to formulate the problem is in terms of mass and momentum conservation of two sediment phases; i.e., a static bed phase and a moving bedload phase above it, with exchange between the two (e.g., Charru, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are several indications that Bagnold's formulation may be flawed or crude. First, for this scaling to match experimental observations, the bulk particle friction coefficient introduced by Bagnold must be fitted to non-physical values (Fernandez Luque & van Beek 1976;Niño, Garcìa & Ayala 1994). Secondly, for conditions that depart from steady uniform flow, Bagnold's model yields poor results, notably for flows over arbitrarily sloping beds (Seminara et al 2002) or at low levels of solid discharge (Fernandez Luque & van Beek 1976;Nelson et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%