2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
167
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
167
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple reporting mechanisms were used to communicate this performance accountability information to the public, such as websites, regular newsletters, media releases and social media. Some ‘grassroots accountability’ mechanisms (Awio et al ., ; O'Leary, ) were also utilised, as outlined later.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple reporting mechanisms were used to communicate this performance accountability information to the public, such as websites, regular newsletters, media releases and social media. Some ‘grassroots accountability’ mechanisms (Awio et al ., ; O'Leary, ) were also utilised, as outlined later.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that ‘grassroots’ (or ‘relational’ or ‘face‐to‐face’) accountability can be an appropriate elective means of delivering performance accountability to stakeholders who have limited powers to hold charities to account (Awio et al ., ; O'Leary, ; Nowland‐Foreman, ). Grassroots accountability is less about formal reporting and more about informal, direct and participative interaction with stakeholders.…”
Section: Charities Public Trust and Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In so doing, we compliment organizational level studies on the effects of funder requirements on NGOs and their beneficiaries (O'Dwyer & Unerman, 2008;O'Leary, 2016) by examining how requirements alter not just organizations but also the field in which they operate. This resonates with accountability studies which focus either on the construction of the organization as an accountable self (Messner, 2009;Roberts, 1991) or the construction of a broader "accountability regime" (Mehrpouya, 2015); we, in contrast, propose that these are interrelated by documenting how making the organization accountable as project implementing NGO is part of bringing the new governable assemblage of international development into being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research topic was chosen because there is general public interest in the accountability of nonprofit organisations and the underlying issues are of broad importance to society. In recent years, there has been an abundance of research on nonprofit accountability (Crawford, Morgan, & Cordery, 2018;O'Leary, 2017). Given recent scandals that have occurred in all types of organisations; at the corporate level (e.g.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frameworks that appear most complete are those of Murtaza (2012) In each of the above frameworks, the concepts within them are integrated within this study's accountability system. The frameworks proposed in the literature do not, however, address the accountability system as a transformative strategic process (see O'Leary, 2017), and a social practice that is managed rather than discharged (Bovens, 2007;Roberts, 2009). To this point, Taylor et al (2014, p.650) wrote: "the motivation of management to discharge downward accountability through published voluntary organisational reports would be strongly over-ridden […]".…”
Section: Accountability System As a Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%