2016
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grassmannization of classical models

Abstract: Applying Feynman diagrammatics to non-fermionic strongly correlated models with local constraints might seem generically impossible for two separate reasons: (i) the necessity to have a Gaussian (noninteracting) limit on top of which the perturbative diagrammatic expansion is generated by Wick's theorem, and (ii) Dyson's collapse argument implying that the expansion in powers of coupling constant is divergent. We show that for arbitrary classical lattice models both problems can be solved/ circumvented by refo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of the algorithm are discussed in [9]. The output of the code, which generates and evaluates all possible Feynman diagrams for the spin correlator up to order 10, is a table shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Results Of the Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The details of the algorithm are discussed in [9]. The output of the code, which generates and evaluates all possible Feynman diagrams for the spin correlator up to order 10, is a table shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Results Of the Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach proposed by Pollet et al [9] consists of representing the partition function of the 3D Ising model in terms of pairs of Grassmann variables. We do not repeat the development of the formalism here but only discuss the differences of the 3D case compared to the 2D case [9], and introduce notation to make the discussion self-contained.…”
Section: Grassmannization Of the Ising Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations