2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grassland dynamics in responses to climate variation and human activities in China from 2000 to 2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 21% of the area was affected by both factors. Our statistics were different from the results of Liu et al [69]; climate variations affected a larger area but quantitatively (NPP change per unit area) contributed less than human activities. Furthermore, Zhang et al [35] studied the grassland dynamics of Xinjiang province and concluded that climate and human factors contributed equally to NPP decrease, whereas human activities played a relatively greater role in NPP restoration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, 21% of the area was affected by both factors. Our statistics were different from the results of Liu et al [69]; climate variations affected a larger area but quantitatively (NPP change per unit area) contributed less than human activities. Furthermore, Zhang et al [35] studied the grassland dynamics of Xinjiang province and concluded that climate and human factors contributed equally to NPP decrease, whereas human activities played a relatively greater role in NPP restoration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings indicate that climate variations affect vegetation areas in China more than human factors, but contribute slightly lesser than anthropogenic factors in NPP change per unit area. Similarly, Liu et al [69] studied grassland dynamics due to climate change and human activities from 2000 to 2013 and concluded that the relative contributions of climate and human activities for grassland dynamics of China were 41.45% and 45.22%, respectively. In the current study, during the base period, climate change and human activities contributed approximately 43% and 22% to grassland dynamics, respectively, whereas 35% of the area was affected by both factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 and 8B). A possible explanation for this is that these arid areas are usually affected by severe water deficits, temperature does not represent an important limiting factor for vegetation growth (Liu et al, 2019a). Apparently, further investigation needs to be conducted in order to figure out how grassland respond to the complex interaction between AP and AMT (Xia et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Responses Of Grassland Npp To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spatio-temporal variation of NPP in grassland ecosystem and their climate controls have rarely been identified in different parts of the world, and these variations and interactions have received a little attention at the global scale (Xing et al, 2010;Gang et al, 2015). Moreover, as mentioned earlier, the earth has experienced three warmest decades during the period from 1980 through 2009 (Liu et al, 2019a). Consequently, a consecutive study on global grassland NPP over the past warmest three decades (1980−2009) is indispensable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Road and railway construction affected the vigilance behavior and initial flight ability of wild birds, and decreased aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP).[2,85,95-98]2. Climate changeIncreased unstable plant biomass; decreased plant cover and aboveground and belowground biomass; stimulated desert exacerbation; declined river water quantity, storage, and flows; decreased grassland quality and species richness, limiting precipitation and temperature; reduced permafrost and glacier receding; altered soil carbon and nitrogen cycling; and transformed alpine meadow into shrubs [25,34,41,55,60,72,73,85,[99][100][101]. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%