2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grass-clover response to cattle slurry N-rates: Yield, clover proportion, protein concentration and estimated N2-fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The legume proportion was, in general, lower for fertilized than unfertilized grass–clover and decreased with sward age, especially for fertilized grass–clover (Figure 3), which partly was due to a large reduction in red‐clover appearance (Figure 2). An increase in grass proportion at the cost of clover with increased N application and sward age has also been found in other studies (Schils & Snijders, 2004; Thers et al., 2022). The reduction in herbage red‐clover yield with increasing sward age is related to its tolerance to frequent defoliation and poor overwintering (Hakala & Jauhiainen, 2007) and has also been observed in other studies (e.g., Jing et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The legume proportion was, in general, lower for fertilized than unfertilized grass–clover and decreased with sward age, especially for fertilized grass–clover (Figure 3), which partly was due to a large reduction in red‐clover appearance (Figure 2). An increase in grass proportion at the cost of clover with increased N application and sward age has also been found in other studies (Schils & Snijders, 2004; Thers et al., 2022). The reduction in herbage red‐clover yield with increasing sward age is related to its tolerance to frequent defoliation and poor overwintering (Hakala & Jauhiainen, 2007) and has also been observed in other studies (e.g., Jing et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For more details about the experiment and previous results, see Eriksen et al (2015), Thers et al (2022), andJensen et al (2022).…”
Section: The Organic Dairy Crop Rotation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N uptake derived from biologically fixed N accounts for 61.0 ± 16.0% of host plant requirement (varying from 38.0% to 74.0% among different taxa; Peoples et al., 2021). An experiment documented that the N uptake in clover was increased from 225.1 to 275.8 kg N ha −1 year −1 in the context of the SNF rising from 18.4 to 31.7 g N m −2 year −1 (Thers et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with regards to the high N fertilization, this recommendation should be adjusted for mixtures and should also not be combined with grazing, as the combination of grazing and slurry application generally results in highest leaching rates in grasslands (Eriksen et al, 2015), whereas cutting generally produced the lowest leaching rates (Wachendorf et al, 2004). Accordingly, in a cut system, even N application rates of up to 300 kg N ha −1 did not increase N leaching in grass‐clover swards of up to 4 years in age, even after the transition to an arable follow‐on crop, while at the same time the continuous slurry application in the grass clover resulted in higher yield benefits effects for a follow‐on crop if the grassland duration was longer than 2 years (Thers et al, 2024). However, N applications in excess of 200 kg N ha −1 did also not increase yields, but rather reduced legume shares and N fixation only (Thers et al, 2022).…”
Section: Considerations For the Successful Implementation Of Grasslan...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, in a cut system, even N application rates of up to 300 kg N ha −1 did not increase N leaching in grass‐clover swards of up to 4 years in age, even after the transition to an arable follow‐on crop, while at the same time the continuous slurry application in the grass clover resulted in higher yield benefits effects for a follow‐on crop if the grassland duration was longer than 2 years (Thers et al, 2024). However, N applications in excess of 200 kg N ha −1 did also not increase yields, but rather reduced legume shares and N fixation only (Thers et al, 2022). The ability to maintain fertilizer levels of around 200 kg N ha −1 (in the absence of livestock) without increasing leaching is especially important as reducing fertilizer amounts also reduces C sequestration, thereby resulting in a trade‐off between C accumulation and N losses, as well as yields (Allard et al, 2007).…”
Section: Considerations For the Successful Implementation Of Grasslan...mentioning
confidence: 99%