2019
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grasping a Chestnut Burr

Abstract: Abstract. This work aimed to assess the role of manual laterality in action coding strategies and, subsequently, in environmental features relevant for each hand’s action. Relying on Eder and Hommel’s (2013) proposal, we distinguished stimulus-related and end state-related consequences in a Simon paradigm where right-handed participants were divided into two groups, one responding with gloves and one without. Two objects were presented pictorially: one for which sensory consequences of grasping were negatively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the potential involvement of force feedback is reinforced by the possibility that the size coding of response can be imputable to the magnitude of responses' feedback (Guerineau et al, 2021). Additionally, the relevance of force feedback into action coding is in accordance with studies reporting the involvement of this kind of feedback in action planning and action control (e.g., Michalland et al, 2019; Saint‐Aubert et al, 2019; Thébault et al, 2018, 2020).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, the potential involvement of force feedback is reinforced by the possibility that the size coding of response can be imputable to the magnitude of responses' feedback (Guerineau et al, 2021). Additionally, the relevance of force feedback into action coding is in accordance with studies reporting the involvement of this kind of feedback in action planning and action control (e.g., Michalland et al, 2019; Saint‐Aubert et al, 2019; Thébault et al, 2018, 2020).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, the complexity and variability of tactile and kinesthetic signals (e.g., [57,58]) may also lead the cognitive system to introduce some flexibility into the integration of such signals. For example, Michalland et al [59] showed that the impact of object dangerousness, object position, and body state depended on the hand used to produce a response; dominant (right) hand responses took into consideration all these features, while left hand responses did not take into consideration the body state.…”
Section: Affordances and The Differential Involvement Of Tactile And Kinesthetic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can also have an impact on performance in experimental tasks when affective information is spatially congruent with the response (Yamaguchi et al, 2018 ), if positive and negative valence of stimuli is directly mapped to a response (Yamaguchi & Chen, 2019 ; see also Blask et al, 2016 , and Proctor, 2013 ), or if affective information is presented (on the handle of) graspable objects (Scerrati et al, 2022 ). Further, grasping objects of positive and negative valence is differently affected by using the dominant versus non-dominant hand (Michalland et al, 2019 ). In short: Valence has the power to affect behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%