Grappling with Geography's Existential Dilemma: The Legacy of William Torrey Harris

Abstract

Geography's existence as a school or college subject has never been a given. While geographers make cases for geography's importance, acceptance of those cases rests not on impassioned rhetoric but on the social and intellectual contexts into which disciplines fit. Contexts are contested and they change. From a seemingly secure position at the beginning of the twentieth century, geography's role in American schools has been eroded and diminished by corrosive forces. Geographers need convincing answers to the existential question lest the subject disappear entirely. Geography's enviable position was in large measure the work of William Torrey Harris. Harris made a compelling existential case for geography and his vision, its implementation, its rejection, and its fate offer a model from which geographers can learn. Understanding how to respond to a social and intellectual context is crucial to geography's future.

History and philosophy of geography III: The haunted, the reviled, and the plural

“…The last year has, in this respect, seen clusters of work attentive, variously, to women’s role in the professional practice of geography (see Ginsburger, 2017; Jöns et al, 2017; Keighren, 2017; Monk, 2017); to the development of critical geography in 20th-century Brazil, particularly through the defining work of Milton Santos (see Ferretti, 2018; Ferretti and Pedrosa, 2018; Melgaço, 2017; Melgaço and Prouse, 2017); to the contributions of Clarence Glacken to the field of environmental history (Rajan, 2017, 2018); and to the ongoing significance of biography as a means of revealing, narrating, and challenging disciplinary histories (see Baigent and Novaes, 2018; Barnes, 2017; Cotoi, 2018; Craggs and Neate, 2018; Downs, 2017; Ferretti, 2019; Lois, 2018; Portuondo, 2018; Tammiksaar et al, 2018).…”