2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphite thermal expansion relationship for different temperature ranges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
80
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Averaging techniques have also been used to devise methodologies which are used to predict the change in CTE as a function of temperature. 53,54 It has also been observed that under load the CTE of graphite changes significantly, from ∼4 × 10…”
Section: Averaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Averaging techniques have also been used to devise methodologies which are used to predict the change in CTE as a function of temperature. 53,54 It has also been observed that under load the CTE of graphite changes significantly, from ∼4 × 10…”
Section: Averaging Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…15 It is well known that the origin of thermal expansion is anharmonic atomic lattice interactions, where the average interatomic distances increase as higher vibrational energy levels become available and are occupied. Therefore, crystal structure can greatly affect the TEC, for example, diamond is a positive TEC material, 16 graphite exhibits negative in-plane but positive out-of-plane TECs, 17 and from experiment and theoretical predictions, graphene is recognized as having a negative TEC over a wide range of temperatures. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Other 2D materials such as monolayer hexagonal boron nitride are also predicted to exhibit a negative TEC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the influence of strain we assume that graphene is free of stress at the formation temperature. With the thermal expansion coefficient of SiC [30] we calculate a relative reduction of the lattice constant of over the same temperature range [31]. Since the SiC substrate is much thicker than the graphene monolayer the ensuing strain will be taken up entirely by the graphene overlayer if no relaxation takes place during cool down.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%