1970
DOI: 10.13182/nt70-a28624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphite and Xenon Behavior and their Influence on Molten-Salt Reactor Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The liquid fuel was circulated through a core of graphite bars which acted as moderator. Studies by Scott and Eatherly [4] showed that an average core power density of 22.2 kW/l (operating condition of MSBR design) would result in a graphite lifetime of approximately 4 years. The reactor design must provide for periodic replacement of the core graphite with minimal plant downtime and complexity of maintenance equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid fuel was circulated through a core of graphite bars which acted as moderator. Studies by Scott and Eatherly [4] showed that an average core power density of 22.2 kW/l (operating condition of MSBR design) would result in a graphite lifetime of approximately 4 years. The reactor design must provide for periodic replacement of the core graphite with minimal plant downtime and complexity of maintenance equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krypton and Xenon are the most important fission gases to be considered in the reactor off‐gas system . Because of the low solubility of Kr and Xe in the primary salt, most of the gases will eventually emerge into the gas plenum above the salt pool, and some of the gas can also diffuse into the structural materials, for example, graphite …”
Section: Impurities Contamination Mechanisms and Available Removal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graphite assemblies directly contact the high‐irradiation molten salt, which is not easy to replace, posing significant technical challenges to the maintenance of an MSR. In addition, the extra shutdown times caused by the replacement of graphite assemblies would not be beneficial to the economics of a reactor, which could, of course, be mitigated to some extent by ensuring that the shutdown time for regular maintenance and repair of the reactor is consistent with that for graphite replacement 8 . Thus, improving the lifespan of the graphite assemblies would be of importance to reduce the difficulty of maintenance and to improve the economic performance of SM‐MSR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, improving the lifespan of the graphite assemblies would be of importance to reduce the difficulty of maintenance and to improve the economic performance of SM‐MSR. The graphite lifespan is mainly affected by the fast neutron fluence and irradiation temperatures in MSRs 8‐10 . As shown in Figure 1, as the neutron fluence increases, the dimension of graphite will first shrink to the minimum size and then appear a turnaround to rapidly expand 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%