2017
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphics for relatedness research

Abstract: Studies of relatedness have been crucial in molecular ecology over the last decades. Good evidence of this is the fact that studies of population structure, evolution of social behaviours, genetic diversity and quantitative genetics all involve relatedness research. The main aim of this article is to review the most common graphical methods used in allele sharing studies for detecting and identifying family relationships. Both IBS and IBD based allele sharing studies are considered. Furthermore, we propose two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification rate for 6th degree pairs can still be improved if more than 35,000 independent MAF 0.50 variants would be used (see Figure 4). The ( p 0 , p 2 ), ( m, s ), and (truek^0, truek^1) scatterplots display estimates in a constrained space (Galván-Femenía et al, 2017), where Euclidean distances between points cannot be safely interpreted. This is particularly true for the higher degree relationships that merge toward the vertex of the triangular region inside the scatterplot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification rate for 6th degree pairs can still be improved if more than 35,000 independent MAF 0.50 variants would be used (see Figure 4). The ( p 0 , p 2 ), ( m, s ), and (truek^0, truek^1) scatterplots display estimates in a constrained space (Galván-Femenía et al, 2017), where Euclidean distances between points cannot be safely interpreted. This is particularly true for the higher degree relationships that merge toward the vertex of the triangular region inside the scatterplot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related pairs can also be distinguished, albeit at lower resolution, by using the co-ancestry coefficient defined as θ = k 1 /2+ k 2 or the kinship coefficient defined as ϕ = θ/2. Galván-Femenía et al (2017) give an overview of graphics used in relatedness research. Figure 1 shows a panel plot of some standard graphics used in IBS and IBD studies for all the pairs of individuals from the CEU population of the 1.000 Genomes project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we used the measure PI_HAT, which estimates the overall proportion of the genome that is identical by descent (IBD) between pairs of individuals, as well as Z scores, which reflect the probability of sharing zero, one or two alleles IBD. The latter probabilities depend directly on relatedness and therefore provide a more precise method for inferring the type of relationship between individuals (Galván-Femenía et al . 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representation of pairwise IBD estimates was done in R v3.5.0 (39) with the method described by Galván-Femenía et al. (40). Using the IBD estimates obtained in the previous step, we used PRIMUS v1.9.0 (41) to predict pairwise relationships and to reconstruct the whole pedigree, considering as unrelated those pairs of individuals with a coefficient of relatedness lower than 0.2 (option -t 0.2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%