1997
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63533-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphical specification and reasoning: Case study generalised railroad crossing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase automata build an operational subset of the Duration Calculus [HZ97] [ORS96,DD97] to this case study using Duration Calculus based methods assume the following properties for trains:…”
Section: Phase Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase automata build an operational subset of the Duration Calculus [HZ97] [ORS96,DD97] to this case study using Duration Calculus based methods assume the following properties for trains:…”
Section: Phase Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another application of graphical, formal notation is described by Dierks and Dietz [16]. This work uses a generalized r ailroad crossing to illustrate a fully graphical approach to the formal development of correct reactive real-time systems.…”
Section: Graphical Formal Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%