2020
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data

Abstract: enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our AUC analysis estimated the overall diagnostic performance of biomarkers compared with their pooled sensitivity and specificity. We generated an SROC plot by weighting each study based on samples that can further enhance SROC to facilitate reporting (96,97). The AUC of weighted SROC curves for the HER2-enriched subtype was higher than those of the other biomarkers assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our AUC analysis estimated the overall diagnostic performance of biomarkers compared with their pooled sensitivity and specificity. We generated an SROC plot by weighting each study based on samples that can further enhance SROC to facilitate reporting (96,97). The AUC of weighted SROC curves for the HER2-enriched subtype was higher than those of the other biomarkers assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data retrieved from the selected studies were included into the RevMan 5.4 software for MacOS systems. We then calculated HSROC and bivariate model parameters to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios with the MetaDTA software [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (Version 2, Biostat, Englewood NJ, 2005), Review Manager software (Version 5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark), R Statistical software (R Core Team 2021) and MetaDTA (Version 2.0) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%