1995
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1995)124<0131:gasmfd>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphical and Statistical Methods for Determining the Consistency of Age Determinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
350
1
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
350
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality control was maintained by the readers recounting earlier samples prior to initiating each reading and crosschecking the readings. The consistency of age estimates between ageing rounds and readers was assessed using age bias plots and chi-square tests of symmetry (McNemar 1947;Bowker 1948;Campana et al 1995;Hoenig et al 1995;Evans and Hoenig 1998). To resolve discrepancies between readers greater than 2 years, a consensus was reached by reading the centra together.…”
Section: Age Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality control was maintained by the readers recounting earlier samples prior to initiating each reading and crosschecking the readings. The consistency of age estimates between ageing rounds and readers was assessed using age bias plots and chi-square tests of symmetry (McNemar 1947;Bowker 1948;Campana et al 1995;Hoenig et al 1995;Evans and Hoenig 1998). To resolve discrepancies between readers greater than 2 years, a consensus was reached by reading the centra together.…”
Section: Age Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bias and precision of annulus counts were analysed by statistical and graphical methods for each pair of replicate counts from the three interpreters. Accordingly, an age bias plot (Campana et al, 1995) was generated and a test of symmetry (Hoenig et al, 1995) computed from the corresponding age-agreement table. In this table, the main diagonal represents the frequency of fish for which the same estimated age is obtained by any combination of two interpreters, whereas each cell off the main diagonal represents a difference in estimated age between the interpreters.…”
Section: > Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…May the first was considered as the birth date to assign individual age to age groups. The index of the coefficient of variation (CV) [5,48] was calculated to assess the level of precision of age interpretations. Systematic differences in estimated age (bias) within readings were assessed by age bias plot.…”
Section: Age Estimate and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%