2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene-reinforced silicon oxycarbide composites prepared by phase transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and NGA-SiOC100, respectively, which are several orders of magnitude higher than those of pristine SiOC following pyrolysis at the same temperatures 59 and are of a similar magnitude to the conductivity of pure graphene aerogels [60][61] . Compared with other reported graphene/PDC composites summarised in Table S1 (SiOC-graphene@1500/1700 50 , SiOC-GO@1700 47 , RGO/CNTS/SiCN@1000 26 , GO/PSZ@800/1000 51 , SiCN-rGO@1000 46 , SiCNO-GO@1000 48 , SiCO/GO@1100 62 , rGO/Si3N4@1600 63 , SiCN/rGOA@1000 49 ), the lightweight, porous properties of the 3D porous NGA-SiOC monoliths (NGA-SiOC15, NGA-SiOC50 and NGA-SiOC100) and the reported graphene/PDCs (SiOC-graphene@1500/1700 50 , SiOC-GO@1700 47 , RGO/CNTS/SiCN@1000 26 , GO/PSZ@800/1000 51 , SiCN-rGO@1000 46 , SiCNO-GO@1000 48 , SiCO/GO@1100 62 , rGO/Si3N4@1600 63 , SiCN/rGOA@1000 49 ) (e) Schematic of the conductive pathway for electron transport in porous graphene/SiOC monoliths and dense random graphene/SiOC composite. (Note: The unreported density of dense composites is defined as 2g/cm 3 in (d)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…and NGA-SiOC100, respectively, which are several orders of magnitude higher than those of pristine SiOC following pyrolysis at the same temperatures 59 and are of a similar magnitude to the conductivity of pure graphene aerogels [60][61] . Compared with other reported graphene/PDC composites summarised in Table S1 (SiOC-graphene@1500/1700 50 , SiOC-GO@1700 47 , RGO/CNTS/SiCN@1000 26 , GO/PSZ@800/1000 51 , SiCN-rGO@1000 46 , SiCNO-GO@1000 48 , SiCO/GO@1100 62 , rGO/Si3N4@1600 63 , SiCN/rGOA@1000 49 ), the lightweight, porous properties of the 3D porous NGA-SiOC monoliths (NGA-SiOC15, NGA-SiOC50 and NGA-SiOC100) and the reported graphene/PDCs (SiOC-graphene@1500/1700 50 , SiOC-GO@1700 47 , RGO/CNTS/SiCN@1000 26 , GO/PSZ@800/1000 51 , SiCN-rGO@1000 46 , SiCNO-GO@1000 48 , SiCO/GO@1100 62 , rGO/Si3N4@1600 63 , SiCN/rGOA@1000 49 ) (e) Schematic of the conductive pathway for electron transport in porous graphene/SiOC monoliths and dense random graphene/SiOC composite. (Note: The unreported density of dense composites is defined as 2g/cm 3 in (d)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…An increase in I G / I D intensity ratio observed for PDC with the addition of Ni, Co, Ni–Pt, and Co–Pt confirms the presence of curved and closed graphitic structures in nanotubes forms . In addition, the strong appearance of a 2D peak at ∼2673 cm –1 for Ni, Co, Ni–Pt, and Co–Pt containing ceramics shows the existence of graphene layer confirming the higher degree of CNT formation. …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Moreover, the microstructure (grain size, thickness, and crystallinity of grain boundaries) [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], the concentration of impurity atoms including lattice oxygen in matrix grains [ 17 , 19 , 20 ], and the conditions of additional heat treatment after sintering [ 6 , 21 ] also affect the functional properties of ceramic–graphene composites. The enhancement of electrical conductivity of ceramic–graphene composites in both in-plane and cross-plane directions is more straightforward than in the case of thermal conductivity, as was confirmed by many studies [ 2 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 22 ]. Electrical conductivity usually increases with an increasing amount of graphene nanoplatelets in both directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%