2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-017-3364-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene Oxide/Polyamide Nanocomposite as a Novel Stir Bar Coating for Sorptive Extraction of Organophosphorous Pesticides in Fruit Juice and Vegetable Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between SPME and SBSE is that SBSE uses an extraction phase about 50–250 times larger than SPME, resulting in higher absolute recoveries and higher sample capacity (He, Chen, & Hu, ). SBSE has found applications in environmental analysis (He et al, ), food analysis (Ayazi & Jaafarzadeh, ; Yao et al, ; You, He, Chen, & Hu, ) and bioanalysis (Manandhar, Maslamani, Petrikovics, Rockwood, & Logue, ). General review articles about SBSE are available (He et al, ; Nogueira, ).…”
Section: Classification Of Microextraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between SPME and SBSE is that SBSE uses an extraction phase about 50–250 times larger than SPME, resulting in higher absolute recoveries and higher sample capacity (He, Chen, & Hu, ). SBSE has found applications in environmental analysis (He et al, ), food analysis (Ayazi & Jaafarzadeh, ; Yao et al, ; You, He, Chen, & Hu, ) and bioanalysis (Manandhar, Maslamani, Petrikovics, Rockwood, & Logue, ). General review articles about SBSE are available (He et al, ; Nogueira, ).…”
Section: Classification Of Microextraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the matrix complexity and the presence of much potential interference in real samples, different extraction and preconcentration methods are needed prior to the instrumental analysis. Up to now, several classical and modern methods, including dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) [8], stir bar sorptive extraction [9], dispersive SPME [10], matrix SPE [10], temperature‐controlled liquid–liquid microextraction [11], and SPME [12], have been developed for the extraction and preconcentration of the OPPs from real samples. Among these techniques, SPE and SPME have remarkable advantages for sample pretreatment due to their simple operation, high enrichment factor (EF), less solvent consumption compared to LLE, safety and compatibility with various detection systems such as HPLC, GC, and CE [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With technological advancements, the development of sample pretreatment is geared toward the direction of saving time, labour, and cost and reducing environmental pollution, as well as miniaturisation and automation. The various sample-pretreatment methods presently used to analyse pesticide in food and environmental samples include solid-phase extraction (SPE) (Shamsipur et al 2016;Wang et al 2015), solid-phase microextraction (SPME) (Zhang et al 2017), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (Ho et al 2013;Takaya et al 2016), magnetic SPE (Dozein et al 2021), magnetic solvent bar liquid-phase microextraction (Wu et al 2015), molecularly imprinted polymers (Boulanouar et al 2018), stir-bar sorptive extraction (Ayazi and Jaafarzadeh 2017;Grossi et al 2008), and QuEChERs (Li et al 2014). These techniques are consistent with the principles of green chemistry as they use small amounts of sorbents and reduce the consumption of toxic organic solvents (Stocka et al 2011), rendering them cost-effective and environmentally friendly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%