2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene Oxide Monolayer as a Compatibilizer at the Polymer–Polymer Interface for Stabilizing Polymer Bilayer Films against Dewetting

Abstract: We investigate the effect of adding graphene oxide (GO) sheets at the polymer-polymer interface on the dewetting dynamics and compatibility of immiscible polymer bilayer films. GO monolayers are deposited at the poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-polystyrene (PS) interface by the Langmuir-Schaefer technique. GO monolayers are found to significantly inhibit the dewetting behavior of both PMMA films (on PS substrates) and PS films (on PMMA substrates). This can be interpreted in terms of an interfacial interaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduced diffusion is consistent with our previous report of dewetting dynamics, in which the dewetting hole of the PMMA thin films is completely prevented by the GO monolayer due to their attractive interactions. 26 It is known that the mobility of PMMA near the Si substrates significantly decreases due to the polymer pinning effect on the substrates. 7 Hence, to eliminate the effect of attractive Si substrates on the diffusion dynamics of the GO-confined PMMA layer, we added spin-coated films of PS with high M w (7100 kDa) between the bottom GO monolayer and Si surface, as illustrated in Figure 2e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This reduced diffusion is consistent with our previous report of dewetting dynamics, in which the dewetting hole of the PMMA thin films is completely prevented by the GO monolayer due to their attractive interactions. 26 It is known that the mobility of PMMA near the Si substrates significantly decreases due to the polymer pinning effect on the substrates. 7 Hence, to eliminate the effect of attractive Si substrates on the diffusion dynamics of the GO-confined PMMA layer, we added spin-coated films of PS with high M w (7100 kDa) between the bottom GO monolayer and Si surface, as illustrated in Figure 2e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, graphene-based polymer nanocomposites have been of particular interest due to the significant impact of graphene on polymer’s physical properties. Graphene oxide (GO), obtained from chemical exfoliation of graphite, has been widely used for polymer nanocomposites due to good dispersion in aqueous solvents or polymer matrices, and also its functionality as a compatibilizer in immiscible polymer blends. , Simulation studies have predicted that GO sheets reduce the mobility of poly­(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films confined to them relative to bulk values without GO . Near the GO surface, chain mobility is significantly restricted due to interactions of the polymer with the GO surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,15 A common approach is the incorporation of colloidal particles at the interfaces. [16][17][18][19] In biological systems, where often multiple phases are in contact in nano-sized geometries, nanoparticles are potential carriers of anti-cancer agents. 20,21 This is in part due to their small size, which enables them to diffuse preferentially in the tumor tissue, similar to the diffusion in a nanopore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of immiscible bilayers, the interfacial interactions begin to dominate the bilayer properties. Thus, tuning of the interface has been an ongoing challenge in this field. , A common approach is the incorporation of colloidal particles at the interfaces. In biological systems, where often multiple phases are in contact in nanosized geometries, nanoparticles are potential carriers of anticancer agents. , This is in part due to their small size, which enables them to diffuse preferentially in the tumor tissue, similar to the diffusion in a nanopore . Such applications require a deep knowledge of the interactions between nanoparticles and their surroundings in a nanofluidic geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%