2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene oxide-in-polymer nanofiltration membranes with enhanced permeability by interfacial polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What's more, the electrostatic interaction between SO4 2-and the polyamide negative surface is stronger than Cl -, leading to the high rejections of Na2SO4 and MgSO4 (exceed above 97.2%). In summary, the as-prepared NF membranes provide the great chance to break out the "trade-off" behavior of the traditional polyamide membranes, showing the high water permeation flux, and maintaining the superior inorganic salts rejection rate (as shown in Figure 5c) [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What's more, the electrostatic interaction between SO4 2-and the polyamide negative surface is stronger than Cl -, leading to the high rejections of Na2SO4 and MgSO4 (exceed above 97.2%). In summary, the as-prepared NF membranes provide the great chance to break out the "trade-off" behavior of the traditional polyamide membranes, showing the high water permeation flux, and maintaining the superior inorganic salts rejection rate (as shown in Figure 5c) [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Water permeation flux of the as-prepared NF membranes with (a) the hydrophilic modified interlayers on the porous substrates or (b) the addition of macromolecular additives in the aqueous PIP solution (test conditions: inorganic salts concentration = 1000 mg/L, pH = 6.0, 25 °C, applied pressure = 0.6 MPa and cross-flow rate = 30 L/h) (c) the comparison of the NF performance with other thin-film composite membranes in the reported literature[39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for doped polyamide layers with the macromolecular additives added in the aqueous PIP solution, the polyamide layer top structures were comparatively denser, with the lower O/N ratio and higher cross-linking degree (shown in Table S5 in the Supporting Information) [38]. [30,39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, the observation of our unimpeded RO‐GO membrane can be mainly attributed to the extremely high water permeability of GO−S nanochannels, which can overwhelm the flux loss by hydrodynamic resistance. In addition, it has been widely recognized that membrane flux is also affected by membrane surface roughness and hydrophilicity, and the rougher and more hydrophilic surface facilitate to attract more water entering into membranes so as to the improvement of water flux . According to the characterizations of surface properties in Figure , GO thin coatings could improve the hydrophilicity but reduce the roughness of RO membranes, while GO thick coatings affect exactly in the opposite way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it has been widely recognized that membrane flux is also affected by membrane surface roughness and hydrophilicity, and the rougher and more hydrophilic surface facilitate to attract more water entering into membranes so as to the improvement of water flux. [36] According to the characterizations of surface properties in Figure 2, GO thin coatings could improve the hydrophilicity but reduce the roughness of RO membranes, while GO thick coatings affect exactly in the opposite way. As a result, both GO coated RO membrane produced no effect on the pristine flux of RO membranes.…”
Section: Membrane Filtration Performancementioning
confidence: 99%