2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene-functionalized polymer composites for self-sensing of ultrasonic waves: An initiative towards “sensor-free” structural health monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A surface-mounted PZT sensor captures guided waves through the piezoelectric response to surface dynamic strain transferred through the bonding layer, 33 while the dispersive GN perceives wave-induced strain within the structure through the piezoresistivity based on the tunnelling effect. 34 Nevertheless, the WT results demonstrate that the time features of different frequencies share similar delay patterns between the first-triggered and later-response signals, which validates the feasibility of achieving AE source localization using GN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A surface-mounted PZT sensor captures guided waves through the piezoelectric response to surface dynamic strain transferred through the bonding layer, 33 while the dispersive GN perceives wave-induced strain within the structure through the piezoresistivity based on the tunnelling effect. 34 Nevertheless, the WT results demonstrate that the time features of different frequencies share similar delay patterns between the first-triggered and later-response signals, which validates the feasibility of achieving AE source localization using GN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…PVP is chosen as the matrix in this study to develop the nanocomposite hybrid for the spray-on nanocomposite sensor, as PVP is a kind of water-soluble polymer that can easily form and further stabilize the dispersion of nanocomposites in the solvent without adding extra surfactant because of its amphiphilic groups (hydrophobic methylene group and hydrophilic amide group) [35]. In the authors’ previous study [36,37], a variety of nanofillers such as carbon black (CB), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and graphene were investigated and proven as promising candidates for developing nanocomposite sensors that can be used for acquiring GUW signals. By virtue of the higher demand for signal quality in active SHM, two-dimensional (2-D) graphene nanoparticles are selected in this study as the nanofiller.…”
Section: Spray-on Sensor Fabrication and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the distance (zi) from a particular mesh node to the elliptical locus calculated by Equation (2) can be used to quantify the probability of the presence of damage at this node. The field value at each mesh node, which is dependent on the distance (zi), can be defined as [6,37]:Ffalse(zfalse)=truezf(zi)dzi, where ffalse(zifalse)=false(1/σi2πfalse)expfalse[zi2/2σi2false] depicts the probability density of damage occurrence at mesh node false(xm,xnfalse), false(m=1,2,,L; n=1,2,,Kfalse) perceived by the sensing path AiSi, σi the standard variance (σi=2…”
Section: Applications To Damage Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact presents a practical burden for its implementation on large-scale structures due to the power supply and weight-cost issues. Modern passive sensors, for example, fiber-optic 7 or nanocomposite ones, 8,9 provide competitive sensitivity to propagating GWs, require fewer cable connections, and could be integrated into the structure during the manufacturing process. Therefore, adequate in situ SHM imaging systems can be developed via the sharing of active and passive elements if a reliable level of imaging quality has been achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a network of piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS), the simulation of reverse GW excitation can be addressed through various PWAS-waveguide interaction models accounting for the basic physical principles related to the inverse piezoelectric effect (pin-force model, FEM-based technique, integral equation-based solution of the contact problem, etc.). However, when dealing with passive sensors, [7][8][9] the physical basis of reemission is not clear. Intuitively, it is reasonable to assume that when TR process from passive (and/or active) sensors is simulated employing some simplified or even arbitrary models for the GW excitation from the sensor locations, these emitted waves would focus on the position of the initial active source/scatterer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%