2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs)—promising materials for antimicrobial coating and film: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms of action have been thoroughly explored, with recently published reviews covering the most important conclusions so far. As suspensions, GBM act either through wrapping, isolating bacteria from the environment, or through insertion or nano knife, physically piercing the membrane, although oxidative stress can also be stimulated [31,42]. As surfaces, they act after direct contact with bacteria, with predominant mechanisms depending on the exposure of either basal planes or sharp edges: electron transference and oxidative stress induction occur mostly when only basal planes are exposed, while besides these, physical damage of the membrane (due to insertion or protein-protein destabilization) can also occur when both structures contact bacteria [40,43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms of action have been thoroughly explored, with recently published reviews covering the most important conclusions so far. As suspensions, GBM act either through wrapping, isolating bacteria from the environment, or through insertion or nano knife, physically piercing the membrane, although oxidative stress can also be stimulated [31,42]. As surfaces, they act after direct contact with bacteria, with predominant mechanisms depending on the exposure of either basal planes or sharp edges: electron transference and oxidative stress induction occur mostly when only basal planes are exposed, while besides these, physical damage of the membrane (due to insertion or protein-protein destabilization) can also occur when both structures contact bacteria [40,43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Therefore, it seems possible that these results are due to the Fe 3 O 4 molecules of rGO/Fe 3 O 4 that could act as a source of Fe + ion and also cover the sharp edges and reactive functional group of rGO preventing its adverse effects on cell growth that suggested as an antifungal mechanism of GBNs in literature. 68 Moreover, the results showed that GA production was improved under the elicitation of rGO/Fe 3 O 4 , and G. lucidum produced significantly…”
Section: Effects Of Gbns On Fungal Growth and Gas Biosynthesismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Figure 2b, the graphene nanosheet observed is approximately 14 nm and is much bigger than a bacteria cell (~ 1 μm), indicating that the mechanism of cell wrapping (discussed in Section 3.2) is able to contribute to the antibacterial activity when using MnFe2O4-G for antibacterial suspension tests. Also, large-size graphene nanosheets enhance the adhesion ability of bacteria, which means more chance to be in contact with and inactivate bacteria (Han et al, 2019). Additionally, the transparent nanosheets presented in Figure 2b indicate a fewlayer graphene.…”
Section: Nanocomposite Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%