2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene-decorated carbon-coated LiFePO4 nanospheres as a high-performance cathode material for lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the weight fraction of graphene was 8.63 wt %. Recently, graphene-decorated carbon-coated LiFePO 4 nanospheres, with approximately 3 wt % graphene, delivered capacities of 164 and 147 mAh g −1 at 0.1 C and 1 C, respectively, and the capacity was retained at 81 mAh g −1 at 20 C. The composites revealed 8% capacity decay at 10 C after 500 cycles [66]. At 0.1 C, 1 C, and 10 C, well-dispersed LFP nanoparticles anchored on a 3D graphene aerogel displayed specific discharge capacities of 167, 153, and 120 mAh g −1 , respectively [67], higher than 3D porous LFP/graphite composite (134 and 48 mAh g −1 ) [68], graphene nanoribbon-wrapped LFP (152 and 103 mAh g −1 ) [69], and 3D amorphous carbon and graphene co-modified LFP (163 and 90 mAh g −1 ) [70].…”
Section: Lfp/graphene Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the weight fraction of graphene was 8.63 wt %. Recently, graphene-decorated carbon-coated LiFePO 4 nanospheres, with approximately 3 wt % graphene, delivered capacities of 164 and 147 mAh g −1 at 0.1 C and 1 C, respectively, and the capacity was retained at 81 mAh g −1 at 20 C. The composites revealed 8% capacity decay at 10 C after 500 cycles [66]. At 0.1 C, 1 C, and 10 C, well-dispersed LFP nanoparticles anchored on a 3D graphene aerogel displayed specific discharge capacities of 167, 153, and 120 mAh g −1 , respectively [67], higher than 3D porous LFP/graphite composite (134 and 48 mAh g −1 ) [68], graphene nanoribbon-wrapped LFP (152 and 103 mAh g −1 ) [69], and 3D amorphous carbon and graphene co-modified LFP (163 and 90 mAh g −1 ) [70].…”
Section: Lfp/graphene Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main peak at 283.9 eV originated from the sp 2 -hybridized graphite single peak, and the peak at 284.9 eV was attributed to disordered sp 3 carbon. [50,51] This was attributed to the large contact area between the electrode, electrolyte and the sucrose-derived carbon,w hich could improvet he Li-ion transfer and electronic conductivity of the electrode. Therefore, the concentrationo fs p 2 carbon on the surfaceo fL iFePO 4 was high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover,t he high peak current value confirmed the good electrochemical properties of this material. [50,51] This was attributed to the large contact area between the electrode, electrolyte and the sucrose-derived carbon,w hich could improvet he Li-ion transfer and electronic conductivity of the electrode. The charge/discharge curves for the Li/LiFePO 4 cells at rates of 0.1 to 10 Ca re shown in Figure 4b.T he discharge capacityd rops if the C-rate is increased owing to the limitation on speed of lithium-ion diffusion at ah igh current density.T he crater-type LiFePO 4 exhibited much higherc apacity than the commercial porous LiFePO 4 prepared by the sol-gel method ( Figure S5), with ah igh discharge capacity of 165.7 mAh g À1 at 0.1 C( 159.5, 151.7, and 140.6 mAh g À1 at 0.5, 1, and 5C,r espectively).I tc ould maintain ac apacity of 127.5 mAh g À1 at ah igh current density of 10 C, whereas the commercial porous LiFePO 4 only managed 97.2 mAh g À1 .A fter 51 cycles, the charging rate was returned to 0.1 C, and the dischargec apacity of the crater-typeL iFePO 4 recovered to 163.5 mAh g À1 ,w hich was approximately9 9% of the initial capacity (Figure 4c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy can indicate the presence and level of impurities in carbon hybridization; 43 the D-band is associated with the disorders or defects in graphitic structures and the Gband is attributed to the presence of graphitic carbon. 44,45 As shown in Fig. 7, the relative intensity I D /I G ratios (where I D and I G are the D-band and G-band Raman intensities 46 ) of the D band ($1329 cm À1 ) and G band ($1584 cm À1 ) for GO and RGO are 1.37 and 0.96, implying that the proportion of defects in RGO is less than that in GO.…”
Section: Characterization Of Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 90%