2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene-based dynamically tunable absorbers through guided mode resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to these facts, the aligned MGDG structure has the weaker electric field intensity and smaller GH shift at the wavelength of m 37.5 m than those in the misaligned MGDG structure. These findings demonstrate that the MGDG structure is able to excite the GMR with the strongest electric field intensities, which effectively increases the interaction between the incident wave and the MGDG structure and its absorption [45][46][47]. Thus, the MGDG structure has the greatly decreased reflectance and the sharp reflection phase change at the wavelength of m 37.5 , m which contributes to its largest GH shift.…”
Section: = =mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Due to these facts, the aligned MGDG structure has the weaker electric field intensity and smaller GH shift at the wavelength of m 37.5 m than those in the misaligned MGDG structure. These findings demonstrate that the MGDG structure is able to excite the GMR with the strongest electric field intensities, which effectively increases the interaction between the incident wave and the MGDG structure and its absorption [45][46][47]. Thus, the MGDG structure has the greatly decreased reflectance and the sharp reflection phase change at the wavelength of m 37.5 , m which contributes to its largest GH shift.…”
Section: = =mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…By properly selecting the slit width as s = 74 nm with other structural parameters kept the same, near-perfect absorption of the monolayer graphene (97.8%) can be obtained at the wavelength of λ r = 1.55 µm with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of ∆λ = 4.0 nm, as indicated by the theoretical RCWA result in Figure 5b. Compared with the previous graphene absorbers whose absorption efficiency is not high in the two-port system composed of graphene [8][9][10], and those metal mirror [17][18][19][20][21] or multilayer Bragg mirror [24][25][26][27][28][29] structuresthat are required to realize high absorption of graphene at critical coupling, the proposed absorber exhibits the advantage of achieving high absorption efficiency of graphene within a comparatively simple two-port system. Figure 5a shows absorption response of the Si-based PCS with graphene as a function of the slit width s. As can be seen in Figure 5a, the absorption of graphene associated with the quasi-BIC modes can be flexibly controlled by merely varying the slit width, and the locations of the two absorption channels of graphene are blue-shifted as s is increased due to the decrease in the effective refractive index of the structure.…”
Section: Basic Principles and Cmt For Absorption Enhancement Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the peak values of light absorption in monolayer graphene are confined in the range of 30–60% in most cases [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. To significantly improve the light absorption of graphene, an effective approach is to integrate the graphene with the metasurfaces supported by the metallic mirror [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] or metallic structured substrate [ 22 , 23 ]. However, due to the inherent ohmic loss of metal materials, the use of the metallic mirror or structured substrate will inevitably result in suppression of light absorption in graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GMR is more likely to occur in subwavelength grating structures [6][7][8], where the grating period is significantly smaller than the incident light wavelength. Such structures exhibit high diffraction efficiency and narrow bandwidth properties, making them suitable for designing narrow-band filters [9][10][11][12][13], optical modulators [14][15][16][17][18], and sensors [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%