2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene: An Antibacterial Agent or a Promoter of Bacterial Proliferation?

Abstract: Summary Graphene materials (GMs) are being investigated for multiple microbiological applications because of their unique physicochemical characteristics including high electrical conductivity, large specific surface area, and robust mechanical strength. In the last decade, studies on the interaction of GMs with bacterial cells appear conflicting. On one side, GMs have been developed to promote the proliferation of electroactive bacteria on the surface of electrodes in bioelectrochemical systems or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 292 publications
(242 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a stimulative potential of nanomaterials was revealed in this test, particularly with the flake-like nanomaterials (i.e., purified CoOF and GO). At the end of the experiment, these structures reached the highest OD, which agrees with the literature, where a growth stimulation by graphene was described (Zhang and Tremblay 2020). Another nanomaterial containing titanium dioxide (CNT TiO 2 ) did not delay the exponential growth, although it significantly slowed down MGR.…”
Section: Growth Curvessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a stimulative potential of nanomaterials was revealed in this test, particularly with the flake-like nanomaterials (i.e., purified CoOF and GO). At the end of the experiment, these structures reached the highest OD, which agrees with the literature, where a growth stimulation by graphene was described (Zhang and Tremblay 2020). Another nanomaterial containing titanium dioxide (CNT TiO 2 ) did not delay the exponential growth, although it significantly slowed down MGR.…”
Section: Growth Curvessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This effect was powerful after 24 h. In the current literature, one can find evidence of the toxicity of graphene oxide against microorganisms and its growth enhancement potential, with the first option as the Fig. 1 The optical density of cultures after co-incubation with nanomaterials for 6, 12, and 24 h; *sample statistically different from the control sample (0) with p < 0.05 most frequent description (Yousefi et al 2017;Zhang and Tremblay 2020). Considering also other "flake-like" structures considered in this study, it appears that these structures were rather biocompatible in the in vitro conditions created in our experiments.…”
Section: Optical Density and Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three main types of graphene materials: graphene (Gr), graphene oxide (GO), and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) are in use for the development of new antimicrobial agents. Their antimicrobial activity depends significantly on the method of synthesis, which determines the sheet number and thickness, as well as the oxygen content [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activity and Applications Of Graphene Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raised the question of whether graphene is an antibacterial agent or a promoter of cell proliferation. To answer this, Zhang et al [ 27 ] debated the mechanisms and factors determining the positive or negative impact of Gr materials on bacteria and summarized that adjustable physicochemical properties and environmental factors determine whether the Gr materials will act as antibacterial materials or will promote bacterial growth. The toxicity of Gr materials toward bacteria is partly explained by their capacity to cause oxidative stress by ROS generated from molecular oxygen.…”
Section: Proposed Mechanisms Of Microbial Adhesion Inhibition By Graphene-based Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the functionalization of CS (positively charged) with CA, the CsA molecules became negatively charged due to the COO − groups originated from CA. In the presence of Gram (−) P. aeruginosa, the electrostatic repulsions occur between the negatively charged cell surface and CsA with negative charges, leading to the growth inhibition of the Gram (−) bacterial strain on the surface of fibrous membranes [56]. In addition, the literature reports that the bacteria with elongated shape (Gram −) are more disturbed compared to the ones with spherical shape (Gram +) due to the larger contact surface area [57].…”
Section: Anti-biofilm Activity Of Nanofibrous Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%