2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.parco.2009.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph partitioning and disturbed diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meyerhenke et al [MMS09b] present a similarity measure based on diffusion that is employed within the Bubble framework. This diffusive approach bears some conceptual resemblance to spectral partitioning, but with advantages in quality [MS12].…”
Section: Random Walks and Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meyerhenke et al [MMS09b] present a similarity measure based on diffusion that is employed within the Bubble framework. This diffusive approach bears some conceptual resemblance to spectral partitioning, but with advantages in quality [MS12].…”
Section: Random Walks and Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow value f ij between blocks i and j specifies how many nodes have to be migrated from i to j in order to balance the partition. As a key and novel property for obtaining good solutions, to determine which nodes should be migrated in which order, the diffusive similarity values computed before within the Bubble framework are used [MMS09b,Mey08].…”
Section: Random Walks and Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the most important metric for edge-cut graph partitioning is the size of the edge-cut (or energy), a number of studies [Hendrickson 1998] show that this metric alone is not enough to measure the partitioning quality. Several metrics are, therefore, defined and used in the literature [Meyerhenke et al 2008[Meyerhenke et al , 2009, among which we selected the following in our evaluations:…”
Section: Edge-cut Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very large scale of the graphs we target poses a major challenge. Although numerous algorithms are known for graph partitioning [Enright et al 2002;Kumar 1999a, 1998;Kernighan and Lin 1970;Meyerhenke et al 2008Meyerhenke et al , 2009Schulz 2012, 2011], including parallel ones, most of the techniques involved assume a form of cheap random access to the entire graph. In contrast to this, large-scale graphs do not fit into the main memory of a single computer; in fact, they often do not fit on a single local file system either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very large scale of the graphs we target poses a major challenge. Although a very large number of algorithms are known for graph partitioning [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], including parallel ones, most of the techniques involved assume a form of cheap random access to the entire graph. In contrast to this, large scale graphs do not fit into the main memory of a single computer, in fact, they often do not fit on a single local file system either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%