2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.08.287110
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph neural fields: a framework for spatiotemporal dynamical models on the human connectome

Abstract: Tools from the field of graph signal processing, in particular the graph Laplacian operator, have recently been successfully applied to the investigation of structure-function relationships in the human brain. The eigenvectors of the human connectome graph Laplacian, dubbed “connectome harmonics”, have been shown to relate to the functionally relevant resting-state networks. Whole-brain modelling of brain activity combines structural connectivity with local dynamical models to provide insight into the large-sc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When structural connectomes are interpreted as graphs, a number of their Laplacian eigenvectors manifest spatial patterns that are reminiscent of well-established functional networks, as shown by Atasoy et al (2016). Under this framework, methods have been proposed for spatio-temporal deconvolution of fMRI data (Bolton et al, 2019), quantification of the coupling strength of resting-state fMRI data with underlying structure (Medaglia et al, 2018;Preti and Van De Ville, 2019), implementation of neural field models (Aqil et al, 2020), prediction of brain disorders (Itani and Thanou, 2020) or behaviorally relevant scores (Bolton and van De Ville, 2020), and for characterization of functional connectivity dynamics in health (Huang et al, 2018b), and its changes, for instance, due to concussion (Sihag et al, 2020), and under hallucinogenic drugs (Atasoy et al, 2017).…”
Section: Structure-informed Processing Of Fmri Data Through Gspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When structural connectomes are interpreted as graphs, a number of their Laplacian eigenvectors manifest spatial patterns that are reminiscent of well-established functional networks, as shown by Atasoy et al (2016). Under this framework, methods have been proposed for spatio-temporal deconvolution of fMRI data (Bolton et al, 2019), quantification of the coupling strength of resting-state fMRI data with underlying structure (Medaglia et al, 2018;Preti and Van De Ville, 2019), implementation of neural field models (Aqil et al, 2020), prediction of brain disorders (Itani and Thanou, 2020) or behaviorally relevant scores (Bolton and van De Ville, 2020), and for characterization of functional connectivity dynamics in health (Huang et al, 2018b), and its changes, for instance, due to concussion (Sihag et al, 2020), and under hallucinogenic drugs (Atasoy et al, 2017).…”
Section: Structure-informed Processing Of Fmri Data Through Gspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When structural connectomes are interpreted as graphs, a number of their Laplacian eigenvectors manifest spatial patterns that are reminiscent of well-established functional networks, as shown by Atasoy et al (2016) . Under this framework, methods have been proposed for spatio-temporal deconvolution of fMRI data ( Bolton et al, 2019 ), quantification of the coupling strength of resting-state fMRI data with underlying structure ( Medaglia et al, 2018 ; Preti and Van De Ville, 2019 ), implementation of neural field models ( Aqil et al, 2021 ), prediction of brain disorders ( Itani and Thanou, 2020 ) or behaviorally relevant scores (Bolton and van De Ville, 2020), and for characterization of functional connectivity dynamics in health ( Huang et al, 2018b ), and its changes, for instance, due to concussion ( Sihag et al, 2020 ), and under hallucinogenic drugs ( Atasoy et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also show that excitatory or inhibitory states can be reconstructed through a finite number of eigenfunctions, and that these largely overlap with the Laplacian eigenvectors of a connectivity matrix estimated from DWI. Interestingly enough, and in line with our attempt at giving a unified view of the gradients and GSP methodologies, this approach linking neural field equations and Laplacian decomposition has been revisited in a GSP perspective in a recent publication (Aqil, Atasoy, Kringelbach, & Hindriks, 2020) introducing the graph neural fields framework (see Table 1).…”
Section: Network Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 88%