2011
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2010.2090349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph-Laplacian Features for Neural Waveform Classification

Abstract: Analysis of extracellular recordings of neural action potentials (known as spikes) is highly dependent upon the accuracy of neural waveform classification, commonly referred to as spike sorting. Feature extraction is an important stage of this process because it can limit the quality of clustering that is performed in the feature space. Principal components analysis (PCA) is the most commonly used feature extraction method employed for neural spike recordings. To improve upon PCA's feature extraction performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details are found in (Ghanbari et al, 2011). As in the case of PCA, the original D -dimensional data set X = {x n } N n = 1 is reduced to a D ′-dimensional data set through the transformation Y = A T X, where A = {a d } D ′ d = 1 and a d is a D -dimensional vector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Details are found in (Ghanbari et al, 2011). As in the case of PCA, the original D -dimensional data set X = {x n } N n = 1 is reduced to a D ′-dimensional data set through the transformation Y = A T X, where A = {a d } D ′ d = 1 and a d is a D -dimensional vector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the performance of mPCA with that of PCA, an improved multimodality pick-up algorithm (mPICK) and Graph Laplacian features (GLF), which project a high-dimensional data onto a low-dimensional space while preserving the topological (i.e., clustering) structure of the original data (Belkin and Niyogi, 2003; He and Niyogi, 2004). GLF is a linear mapping, solves the difficulties arising from the non-linearity of Laplacian eigen maps in a model-based clustering (Chah et al, 2011), and exhibits an excellent performance in spike sorting (Ghanbari et al, 2011). However, the computational cost of GLF increases drastically for larger data size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Raheleh Kafieh et al [7] and Hang Su et al [12] consider only segmentation of a single 2D microscopic image, and the work by Yasser Ghanbari et al [4] considers only time-domain analysis, and the work by A. Singer and H.-T. Wu [11] considers only 2D tomography for large number of sampling on a phantom model.…”
Section: Relation To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This graph-based algorithm has advantages of its simplicity, interpretability and provides efficient representation for complex data structure [1][2][3]. It has been used for bio-signal and bio-image processing such as spike sorting of neural signal [4], protein function prediction [5], image classification of MRI [6] and retinal layered image segmentation [7]. The application on 3D reconstruction of bioimaging is first addressed by Ronald R. Coifman et al [8,9] for cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM), in which hundreds to thousands unknown orientations of view of a molecule could be ordered so that reconstructing 3D structure of a single molecule is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see [1][2][3][4][5]. Quiroga [6] proposed a technique that combines wavelet transformation (WT) with superparamagnetic clustering without assumptions such as low variance or Gaussian distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%