2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2004.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph isomorphism completeness for chordal bipartite graphs and strongly chordal graphs

Abstract: This paper deals with the graph isomorphism (GI) problem for two graph classes: chordal bipartite graphs and strongly chordal graphs. It is known that GI problem is GI complete even for some special graph classes including regular graphs, bipartite graphs, chordal graphs, comparability graphs, split graphs, and k-trees with unbounded k. On the other side, the relative complexity of the GI problem for the above classes was unknown. We prove that deciding isomorphism of the classes are GI complete.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively speaking, the linear (or one dimensional) structure of an interval graph makes these problems tractable, and this two dimensional extension makes them intractable. Such results for intractability also can be found in the literature; the Hamiltonian cycle problem is N P-complete on chordal bipartite graphs [37], and the graph isomorphism problem is GI-complete on chordal bipartite graphs and strongly chordal graphs [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Intuitively speaking, the linear (or one dimensional) structure of an interval graph makes these problems tractable, and this two dimensional extension makes them intractable. Such results for intractability also can be found in the literature; the Hamiltonian cycle problem is N P-complete on chordal bipartite graphs [37], and the graph isomorphism problem is GI-complete on chordal bipartite graphs and strongly chordal graphs [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For each of these parameters, it remains an open question whether the problem is FPT. On the other hand, GI has been shown to be FPT when parameterized by eigenvalue multiplicity [5], tree distance width [21], the maximum size of a simplical component [19,20] and minimum feedback vertex set [12]. Bouland et al [2] showed that the problem is FPT when parameterized by the tree depth of a graph and extended this result to a parameter they termed generalised tree depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this sense, counting/random generation/enumeration on a graph class seems to be intractable if the isomorphism problem for the class is as hard as that for general graphs (See [38] for further details of this topic). It is known that the graph isomorphism problem can be solved in linear time for interval graphs [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%