2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14165-2_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Homomorphisms with Complex Values: A Dichotomy Theorem

Abstract: Graph homomorphism has been studied intensively. Given an m × m symmetric matrix A, the graph homomorphism function is defined aswhere G = (V, E) is any undirected graph. The function Z A (·) can encode many interesting graph properties, including counting vertex covers and k-colorings. We study the computational complexity of Z A (·) for arbitrary symmetric matrices A with algebraic complex values. Building on work by Dyer and Greenhill [13], Bulatov and Grohe [4], and especially the recent beautiful work by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
117
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the lemma, let us fix k ≤ m and show how to compute the coefficients a H,k , assuming that we have already computed and listed the coefficients a H,k ′ for all k ′ < k. Let us fix H ∈ C αk (G). By (13), it suffices to compute the coefficient of ind(H, ·) in p k−i e i for i = 1, . .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To prove the lemma, let us fix k ≤ m and show how to compute the coefficients a H,k , assuming that we have already computed and listed the coefficients a H,k ′ for all k ′ < k. Let us fix H ∈ C αk (G). By (13), it suffices to compute the coefficient of ind(H, ·) in p k−i e i for i = 1, . .…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since e 1 = −p 1 , this implies that the same holds for p 1 . By induction, (29) and (13) (using that e 0 = 1) we have that for each ℓ…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 72mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One natural framework is the counting Constraint Satisfaction Problem (#CSP) [19,2,20,4,23,3,8,7,1]. Another is Graph Homomorphism (GH) [31,28,22,5,21,26,6,9], which can be seen as a special case of #CSP. Such frameworks express a large class of counting problems in the Sum-of-Product form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a classical result of R. Ladner, and its generalization by K. Ambos-Spies, [Lad75,AS87], there are infinitely many degrees (via polynomial time reducibility) between P and NP, and between P and #P, provided P = NP. In contrast to this, the complexity of evaluating partition functions or counting graph homomorphisms satisfies a dichotomy theorem: either evaluation is in P or it is #P-complete, [DG00, BG05,CCL13]. For the definition of the complexity class #P, see [GJ79] or [Pap94].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%