2016
DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2016.2600859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Frequency Analysis of Brain Signals

Abstract: This paper presents methods to analyze functional brain networks and signals from graph spectral perspectives. The notion of frequency and filters traditionally defined for signals supported on regular domains such as discrete time and image grids has been recently generalized to irregular graph domains, and defines brain graph frequencies associated with different levels of spatial smoothness across the brain regions. Brain network frequency also enables the decomposition of brain signals into pieces correspo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
169
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has gained more and more attention in neuroscience studies, for instance parcellating brain areas (Johansen-Berg et al , 2004;Fan et al , 2016) , identifying functional areas and networks (Craddock et al , 2012;Atasoy, Donnelly and Pearson, 2016) , and generating connectivity gradients (Margulies et al , 2016) . Recently, studies have found that, by decomposing the task-evoked fMRI signals using GSP, the resultant graph representations strongly associated with cognitive performance and learning (Huang et al , 2016;Medaglia et al , 2018) . These findings brought new opportunities for the application of GSP on neuroimaging analysis.…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network On Brain Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has gained more and more attention in neuroscience studies, for instance parcellating brain areas (Johansen-Berg et al , 2004;Fan et al , 2016) , identifying functional areas and networks (Craddock et al , 2012;Atasoy, Donnelly and Pearson, 2016) , and generating connectivity gradients (Margulies et al , 2016) . Recently, studies have found that, by decomposing the task-evoked fMRI signals using GSP, the resultant graph representations strongly associated with cognitive performance and learning (Huang et al , 2016;Medaglia et al , 2018) . These findings brought new opportunities for the application of GSP on neuroimaging analysis.…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network On Brain Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A work by Nguyen et al represented the human body as a threedimensional dynamic mesh and applied graph wavelet filter banks to compress information of position and color, outperforming usual methods for coding of the human body [47]. The processing of brain signals may be, however, the most intriguing and prolific of such applications, arising through the assignment of signals such as fMRI readings to graphs defined by functional brain networks [48], [49], which have for example demonstrated a close relation between the signals' lowest and highest frequency components and the learning of a motor task [50]. 231 As mentioned in the Subsection V-B, the regularization of a discrete-valued graph signal was used for data classification in [23].…”
Section: Other Areas Of Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, the high pass component focuses on the differences between users with similar taste for the particular item. With this interpretation one can see (8) as a filter that eliminates the irrelevant features (middle frequencies), smoothes out the similar components (low frequencies) and preserves the discriminative features (high frequencies). This band-stop behavior where both high and low graph frequencies are preserved is not uncommon in image processing (image de-noising and image sharpening, respectively) [13], and was also observed in brain signal analytics [8], [14].…”
Section: Cofi From a Graph Sp Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%