2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ibcast.2019.8667174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Centrality Based Spam SMS Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using parallelization results in reduced training time of the model. Extreme Gradient Boosting 42 is used for the classification and regression tasks, such as spam detection, face recognition, and financial predictions 42–47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using parallelization results in reduced training time of the model. Extreme Gradient Boosting 42 is used for the classification and regression tasks, such as spam detection, face recognition, and financial predictions 42–47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In graph theory, centrality measurement identifies how important nodes are close to each other. Centrality measurement can be used to distinguish important nodes in the graph [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centrality type that used on the research is degree centrality and closeness centrality. The result in the study showed that degree centrality gave the best precision and recall results with 81% and 76%, respectively [1]. In another research about implementing term weighting for text categorization, centrality is used to categorize a single label text that was implemented using term weighting (TW), which represents the term value of each centrality type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other interesting studies include the application of graph centrality in SMS spam detection, 56,57 factorial analysis filtering approaches on linguistic techniques, 14 the Rough-set and Naïve-Bayes algorithm, 58 FIMESS approach which uses external features like invalid characters, time inaccuracies and blacklisted keywords to filter SMS spam was presented in Androulidakis et al 59 After a thorough review of related studies, some of the identified shortfalls include the following: insufficient dataset for training effectively and classifying SMS, the problem of class imbalance, challenges with time complexity of some existing approaches, problem of increasing misclassification rate and so forth. Therefore, this study adopted a deep learning model based on BiLSTM for SMS spam classification using two SMS datasets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%