2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.07137
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph-based Matched Field Localization for an Underwater Source

Abstract: Matched Field Processing (MFP) locates the underwater sources by matching the received data with the replica vectors, which could be regarded as a generalized beamformer. In this paper, the MFP method is combined with a recently developed framework-Graph Signal Processing (GSP) method. Following the paradigm of GSP, a spatial adjacency matrix is constructed for the arbitrary distributed sensors based on the Green's function, then the source is located by utilizing the graph Fourier transform. The simulation re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4b,d are the dimensionality reduction plan views of Figure 4a,c, respectively. The blue curve is the result of the azimuth estimation of the full GSP algorithm; the red curve is the result of the estimation of the nofull GSP algorithm according the previous work [23]; and the yellow curve is the original azimuth parameter. From Figure 4b of the dual target estimation, it can be seen that the blue line represented by the fully GSP can achieve the −3 db sidelobe effect at the −40 db response strength and can accurately estimate the target point {−30 • , 45 • }; compared with the red line of the nofull GSP algorithm, the full GSP has lower side lobes and more accurate results.…”
Section: Azimuth Estimation Results and Monte Carlo Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4b,d are the dimensionality reduction plan views of Figure 4a,c, respectively. The blue curve is the result of the azimuth estimation of the full GSP algorithm; the red curve is the result of the estimation of the nofull GSP algorithm according the previous work [23]; and the yellow curve is the original azimuth parameter. From Figure 4b of the dual target estimation, it can be seen that the blue line represented by the fully GSP can achieve the −3 db sidelobe effect at the −40 db response strength and can accurately estimate the target point {−30 • , 45 • }; compared with the red line of the nofull GSP algorithm, the full GSP has lower side lobes and more accurate results.…”
Section: Azimuth Estimation Results and Monte Carlo Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article is different from the previous work [23], we use a fully connected way to construct the graph signal. The proposed graph signal matrix structure diagram is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Fully Connected Graph Of Array Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%