2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12670-3_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grapevine Phenology Prediction: A Comparison of Physical and Machine Learning Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on results from previous work [ 60 , 61 ], an ANN was selected for training, but other more complex models could be trained to see if they would be able to obtain better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on results from previous work [ 60 , 61 ], an ANN was selected for training, but other more complex models could be trained to see if they would be able to obtain better results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 (left) shows the location of the monitoring sites. Data from the cadaster of the Spanish registry [ 65 ] and the Aragon Open Data portal [ 66 ] provided the geographical description of the monitoring points, also allowing, through their location, to link each point to the nearest weather station as well as to information related to their geopositioning [ 60 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations