2019
DOI: 10.3390/foods8020051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grape Pomace Extracts as Fermentation Medium for the Production of Potential Biopreservation Compounds

Abstract: Microbial spoilage causes food losses in the food industry and as such, the use of synthetic chemical preservatives is still required. The current study proposes the use of agro-waste, i.e., grape pomace extracts (GPE), as production medium for biopreservation compounds. Production kinetics, subsequent to optimization using response surface methodology (RSM) for biopreservation compounds production was studied for three yeasts using GPE broth as a fermentation medium. The results showed that the highest volume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study therefore suggests that these yeasts could offer different types of metabolites for growth inhibition, against a variety of spoilage organisms, than those of a proteomic nature, which is in agreement with other reports [15,22]. We previously reported [18] that the growth inhibition activity of the crude biopreservatives produced by C. pyralidae Y1117, P. kluyveri Y1125, and Pichia kluyveri Y1164 was possibly due to volatile organic compounds, i.e., isoamyl acetate, isoamyl alcohol, 2-phenyl ethylacetate, and 2-phenyl ethanol. However, the focus of this study was on investigating the growth inhibition activity of the crude biopreservatives, which can potentially be used as pre-and post-harvest biocontrol agents.…”
Section: Effect Of Proteolytic Enzymes On the Denaturation Of The Crusupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study therefore suggests that these yeasts could offer different types of metabolites for growth inhibition, against a variety of spoilage organisms, than those of a proteomic nature, which is in agreement with other reports [15,22]. We previously reported [18] that the growth inhibition activity of the crude biopreservatives produced by C. pyralidae Y1117, P. kluyveri Y1125, and Pichia kluyveri Y1164 was possibly due to volatile organic compounds, i.e., isoamyl acetate, isoamyl alcohol, 2-phenyl ethylacetate, and 2-phenyl ethanol. However, the focus of this study was on investigating the growth inhibition activity of the crude biopreservatives, which can potentially be used as pre-and post-harvest biocontrol agents.…”
Section: Effect Of Proteolytic Enzymes On the Denaturation Of The Crusupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The grape pomace extract was also tested for growth inhibition activity against the selected spoilage yeasts (Dekkera anomala, Dekkera bruxellensis, and Zygosaccharomyces bailii. Growth inhibition activity and quantification was carried out as described by Mewa-Ngongang et al [18,20]. Growth inhibition activity was quantified using the concept of the volumetric zone of inhibition (VZI), with the units being reported as a liter contaminated solidified media per mL crude biopreservatives used (L. CSM/mL BCU), as described by Mewa-Ngongang et al [20].…”
Section: Yeasts Selection Growth Inhibition Activity (Gia) and Scrementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the negative controls, the visual (Figure 3A) and the graphical (Figure 3B) representation showed C. pyralidae and P. kluyveri producing VOCs that have an ability to completely inhibit the growth of B. cinerea , C. acutatum and R. stolonifer . Apart from the abovementioned cell antagonistic properties, the biocontrol mechanisms include the ability to secrete extracellular metabolites (e.g., VOCs) with growth inhibition activity against spoilage fungi [39,40,49,50]. The antagonistic effect of VOCs produced by Debaryomyces hansenii against Mucor circinelloides , Aspergillus sp., Fusarium proliferatum and F. subglutinans was also confirmed previously using the same mouth to mouth assay technique [48].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%