2007
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2007.048330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granulomatous reaction to injectable hyaluronic acid (Restylane) diagnosed by fine needle biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While numerous studies have demonstrated that exogenous, high molecular weight HA can inhibit the infiltration, proliferation, and cytokine production of macrophages [2831, 52, 53], there is an equally large body of evidence showing that HA can be associated with macrophage activation and adhesion as well as foreign body giant cell response [5458]. It is important to note that previous studies investigated HA in endogenous, soluble, injectable, or pure hydrogel form, in either cell culture or in vivo injury models; all of which differ from the form of HA and in vivo model system employed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While numerous studies have demonstrated that exogenous, high molecular weight HA can inhibit the infiltration, proliferation, and cytokine production of macrophages [2831, 52, 53], there is an equally large body of evidence showing that HA can be associated with macrophage activation and adhesion as well as foreign body giant cell response [5458]. It is important to note that previous studies investigated HA in endogenous, soluble, injectable, or pure hydrogel form, in either cell culture or in vivo injury models; all of which differ from the form of HA and in vivo model system employed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Before 1999, the reported rate of delayed reactions to HA fillers was 0.07%. The introduction of highly purified products decreased the incidence of such side effects to 0.02%, 1 which is now the accepted safety threshold for HA-based products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, combining the clinical history, presence of multinucleated giant cells, variable foreign material morphology, and radiographic features together supported our diagnosis in this case. The formation of subcutaneous nodules as a result of injectable soft tissue fillers is an uncommon adverse event but is well documented, with foreign body granulomas occurring weeks after injection . This case illustrates multiple potential diagnostic pitfalls in the cytologic evaluation of this reaction to HA fillers that have not been previously described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial HA fillers are generally well tolerated but rarely can produce localized transient allergic symptoms, superficial bruising due to anti‐coagulative effects of HA, and vascular occlusion . Rare instances of foreign body granulomas have also been reported and are hypothesized to result from protein and bacterial DNA impurities left by the production process causing an inflammatory reaction . Here we report a case of foreign body giant cell reaction to HA filler injection that posed a diagnostic dilemma by mimicking either a primary parotid gland neoplasm or a metastatic lesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%