2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption-photocatalysis hybrid system in the removal of herbicide from water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, adsorption onto solid adsorbents has environmental significance, since it can effectively remove pollutants from both aqueous and gaseous streams (Aksu and Kabasakal 2004;Kah and Brown 2007;Areerachakul et al 2007). …”
Section: A Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, adsorption onto solid adsorbents has environmental significance, since it can effectively remove pollutants from both aqueous and gaseous streams (Aksu and Kabasakal 2004;Kah and Brown 2007;Areerachakul et al 2007). …”
Section: A Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption by activated carbon (AC) has been used successfully for the advanced (tertiary) treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater (EPA, 2000;Coelho et al, 2006;Areerachakul et al, 2007;El-Sharkawy et al, 2007). The main disadvantage of such methodology is that the saturated AC must be regenerated before reuse (Sheintuch and Matatov-Meytal, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of such methodology is that the saturated AC must be regenerated before reuse (Sheintuch and Matatov-Meytal, 1999). Moreover, the spent carbon itself may have to be handled as a hazardous waste at the end of the treatment (Sheintuch and Matatov-Meytal, 1999;Coelho et al, 2006;Areerachakul et al, 2007). Therefore, decomposition of the adsorbed organics and regeneration of the adsorbent is a very critical step to the cost-effective use of AC in water treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo-Fenton gives 20% higher removal than Fenton UV was not enough to degrade bisphenol A. Experiments with UV/H 2 O 2 give a better removal of estrogenic activity was dosed at a rate of 1.5 g L −1 ; C 0 = 10 mg L −1The system had a high removal rate of over 90%Areerachakul et al[82] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%