Grand Rounds for Sound System Disorder. Conclusion: What was Learned

Shelton, Ralph L.

doi:10.1055/s-2008-1064168

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The comparative benefit of different assessment frameworks in effecting treatment outcomes is an area of investigation that is lacking in our field. Although there have been a few published reports which compared different assessment frameworks in providing a thorough phonological description of one child (e.g., clinical forums coordinated by Shelton, 1993, andWilliams, 2002; and a comparative analysis of different phonological process analyses by Dunn, 1982, andDyson &Robinson, 1987), there have been no studies that have examined the treatment outcomes resulting from different assessments. A couple of studies have compared the differences in target selection resulting from divergent assessments of the sound system of one child (Baker & Bernhardt, 2004;Dyer-Mistone, Guello, & Williams, 1993).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

A systematic perspective for assessment and intervention: A case study

Williams

2006

Advances in Speech Language Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systemic perspective was employed in completing a phonological analysis and developing an intervention plan for Jarrod, a 7;0 year old child who exhibited a severe speech sound disorder characterized by inconsistency. Results of the Systemic Phonological Analysis of Child Speech (SPACS) revealed a limited sound system that was characterized by phonotactic inventory constraints, positional constraints, and sequence constraints. Mapping the child-to-adult sound systems through phoneme collapses revealed a logical and symmetrical system that maintained systematicity, yet permitted variability. Based on the organizational principles suggested by the phoneme collapses, targets were identified for intervention using the distance metric approach, which is based on the function of sounds within a given system rather than the characteristics of a given sound, and assumes that targets will interact dynamically with the child's unique sound system. Finally, a multiple oppositions treatment approach intended to facilitate learning across phoneme collapses and lead to system-wide phonological restructuring was described.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

A systematic perspective for assessment and intervention: A case study

Williams

2006

Advances in Speech Language Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Terminology, Classification, Description, Measurement, Assessment and Targets

Bowen

2015

Children's Speech Sound Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prologue

Williams

2002

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The pragmatic challenge posed by the forum of completing an assessment within a 60 to 90 minute time limit challenges us to think about the theoretical perspectives that underlie our evaluation procedures. Hopefully, it will lead us to question some of our procedures in light of new theories and clinical advances and to develop stronger rationales for and greater understanding of "tried and true" procedures.

show abstract

Grand Rounds for Sound System Disorder. Conclusion: What was Learned

Cited by 5 publications

References 8 publications

A systematic perspective for assessment and intervention: A case study

A systematic perspective for assessment and intervention: A case study

Terminology, Classification, Description, Measurement, Assessment and Targets

Prologue

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About