2018
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grand Challenges in Nuclear Physics: A Long and Exciting Way to Go

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, being based on the detection of neutrinos captured by tritium nuclei, a process with no energy threshold, PTOLEMY has a vast physics case, able to detect very low energy fluxes, and to provide constraints on neutrino properties, those of standard ones as well as of exotic sterile species. Furthermore, it was also realized that the PTOLEMY setup (but without tritium) could be a way to observe dark matter particles with masses in the MeV mass range, keeping track of their arrival directions [103,104], while the complete detector setup (with tritium) can also serve as a "laboratory" to test "ab-initio" theoretical predictions of few-nucleon systems, and therefore ultimately of the models for nuclear interactions and weak currents [105].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, being based on the detection of neutrinos captured by tritium nuclei, a process with no energy threshold, PTOLEMY has a vast physics case, able to detect very low energy fluxes, and to provide constraints on neutrino properties, those of standard ones as well as of exotic sterile species. Furthermore, it was also realized that the PTOLEMY setup (but without tritium) could be a way to observe dark matter particles with masses in the MeV mass range, keeping track of their arrival directions [103,104], while the complete detector setup (with tritium) can also serve as a "laboratory" to test "ab-initio" theoretical predictions of few-nucleon systems, and therefore ultimately of the models for nuclear interactions and weak currents [105].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%