2004
DOI: 10.4171/zaa/1215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grand and Small Lebesgue Spaces and Their Analogs

Abstract: We give the following, equivalent, explicit expressions for the norms of the small and grand Lebesgue spaces, which depend only on the non-decreasing rearrangement (we assume here that the underlying measure space has measure 1): f L (p ≈ [f * (s)] p ds 1 p (1 < p < ∞). Similar results are proved for the generalized small and grand spaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have applications to some boundary value problems, see [17], [6]. Our investigation is closely related to [7], [4], where the second and the third authors studied the grand and small Lebesgue spaces and their analogs. The main difference with [7] is that now we do not use the general interpolation-extrapolation theory, although the technique from [13] is applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They have applications to some boundary value problems, see [17], [6]. Our investigation is closely related to [7], [4], where the second and the third authors studied the grand and small Lebesgue spaces and their analogs. The main difference with [7] is that now we do not use the general interpolation-extrapolation theory, although the technique from [13] is applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if (t) = t p , h(t) = 1, N(σ ) = σ , and μ(X) = 1, then we get the grand Lebesgue space L p) ([12], [7]). In this case (see Proposition 2.6 below)…”
Section: Grand Orlicz Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following extrapolation spaces are considered in [17,13,15,6,5] and [8] among other papers. Subsequently, given positive functions f, g defined on an interval I, we write f (t) ∼ g(t) if there are constants c 1 , c 2 …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%