Gramsci and Althusser Encountering Machiavelli: Hegemony and/as New Practice of Politics

Abstract

Antonio Gramsci and Louis Althusser encountered Machiavelli's work and they both attempted to rethink the very possibility of political practice through their respective readings of the Florentine thinker. In a certain way for both Gramsci and Althusser, the reading of Machiavelli was the experimental site where they elaborated their own conceptions of politics, either in the form of Gramsci's quest for the 'modern Prince', the political and organizational form of a potential hegemony of the subaltern, or in the form of Althusser's constant redefinition of a potential new practice of politics in a communist perspective. The reading of Machiavelli was for Althusser also one of the terrains upon which he attempted to confront Gramsci, something that is particularly evident in a series of Althusser's texts in the 1970s from Machiavelli and Us to the recently published Que faire? The aim of this article is to do a comparative reading of the approaches to Machiavelli offered by Gramsci and Althusser, focusing in particular on the tensions running through Althusser's reading of Gramsci's writings on Machiavelli. In particular, I will offer a reading of Althusser's extensive criticism of Gramsci in 1977-1978, linking it to his critique of Eurocommunism. Then, I will go back to Gramsci, and in particular Notebook 13, in order to bring forward not only the aspects of Gramsci that Althusser tended to overlook but also how Gramsci is in fact thinking the very question that Althusser attempted to pose, namely that of a new practice of politics for communism.

Práctica política y Estado en los límites del marxismo: el debate Poulantzas/Althusser (1976-1979)

“…Sotiris (2017) sostiene, en cambio, que ambos mantuvieron con la teoría gramsciana una relación compleja que incluye tanto la confrontación como la apropiación. Si Althusser atacó al historicismo y a la noción de hegemonía y retomó su crítica a la distinción público/privado, Poulantzas reutilizó la noción de hegemonía para aplicarla a las prácticas políticas del bloque en el poder y concedió valor a la idea de la especificidad nacional de todo socialismo.…”