Grammaticalization at an early stage: futurebe going toin conservative British dialects

Abstract

The Englishgofuture, a quintessential example of grammaticalization, has shown layering withwillsince at least 1490. To date, most synchronic evidence for this development comes from dialects wherebe going torepresents a sizable proportion of the future temporal reference system. However, in the United Kingdom in the late twentieth century there were still dialects wherebe going towas only beginning to make inroads, representing a mere 10–15 per cent of future contexts. These varieties offer an effective view of the early stages of grammatical change.Statistical analysis of nearly 5,000 variable contexts reveals that the use ofbe going tois increasing across generations, but at different rates, depending on location and orientation to mainstream norms. Major patterns of use mirror previous findings:be going tois favoured for subordinate clauses. However, other widely reported constraints conditioningbe going toare radically different across age groups, exposing contrasts between incipient vs later stages of grammaticalization. In the most conservative dialectsbe going tois strongly correlated with negatives and questions especially in the first person singular. This suggests that these contexts may have been the ‘trigger’ environments for redistribution of meaning of the incoming grammatical form (Hopper & Traugott 1993: 85). The fact that strong effects of negatives and questions endure in contemporary urban varieties (Torres-Cacoullos & Walker 2009) confirms that grammaticalization begins in very specific syntactic contexts, and impacts on the system for generations to come. In contrast, other reported constraints – resistance ofbe going toin the first person singular and extension to inanimates and far future readings – emerge across generations, suggesting they are later developments.Taken together, these findings demonstrate how synchronic dialects show us incremental steps in the grammaticalization process. Comparative sociolinguistic analysis thus offers insights into which patterns define the point of grammaticalization itself; which derive from systemic processes; which can be attributed to discourse routines and collocations; and how these factors converge in shaping the evolution of grammar.

Competing modal periphrases in Spanish between the 16th and the 18th centuries

“…On the other hand, the much less frequent negative clause contexts act as an important structural entry point for the diffusion of the emerging variants (16th c.: FW .28; 18th c.: FW .31), which confirms the important role of negative polarity identified in other processes of grammaticalization and syntactic change (Torres Cacoullos & Walker 2009;Tagliamonte et al 2014). …”

Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English

“…Hothorn, Hornik & Zeileis 2006), an analysis technique which is crucially based on this sort of data sub-setting. Lastly, future research should also study the possibility that the (subtle) differences across varieties are due to differential stages in the evolution of the syntactic variants themselves: the datasets on which the present study's analysis is based are an excellent resource to investigate how speakers of particular vernacular varieties are slower or quicker to adopt progressive syntactic variants in particular contexts (see Tagliamonte, Durham & Smith 2014).…”

General introduction: A comparative perspective on probabilistic variation in grammar

“…As to grammar specifically, we know that intra-systemic grammatical variation -that is, variation within and across varieties of the same language -is highly systematic, and that the determinants of this variation are numerous, multifactorial, and probabilistically conditioned (e.g. Gries 2003;Bresnan & Hay 2008;Tagliamonte, Durham & Smith 2014;Szmrecsanyi et al 2016). Results of such studies are generally taken to be evidence for a model of grammar that is quantitative and probabilistic.…”