2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44805-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grammatical Agreement and Automatic Morphological Disambiguation of Inflectional Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full tag is replaced by the POS tag (the first two fields); there are 60 POS tags. The TM3 8 Czech morphological processing was studied by Petkevič (2001), Hlavácová (2001) (who focuses on handling OOV words), and Mráková and Sedlacek (2003) (who use partial parsing to reduce the set of possible analyses), inter alia. feature templates are included twice: once for the full tag and once for a coarser tag (the first PDT field, for which there are 12 possible values).…”
Section: Factored Tags and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full tag is replaced by the POS tag (the first two fields); there are 60 POS tags. The TM3 8 Czech morphological processing was studied by Petkevič (2001), Hlavácová (2001) (who focuses on handling OOV words), and Mráková and Sedlacek (2003) (who use partial parsing to reduce the set of possible analyses), inter alia. feature templates are included twice: once for the full tag and once for a coarser tag (the first PDT field, for which there are 12 possible values).…”
Section: Factored Tags and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivations for our work come from: a possibility of encoding long distance dependencies in decision rules, applications of rule-based tagging for Czech, e.g. [12,13], an improvement introduced by the combined approach in [9] and an the work on construction of tagging rules for Polish [15]. Realising the difficulty of discovering tagging rules by hand, we wanted to develop a process of automatic acquisition of rules from the IPI PAN Corpus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%