2016
DOI: 10.1353/jsl.2016.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grammars of Participle Agreement with Conjoined Subjects in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some previous experimental work on agreement strategies in South Slavic languages (see Willer-Gold et al 2016;Čordalija et al 2016), it was demonstrated that the closest conjunct agreement (CCA) is the only available strategy for agreement with conjoined NPs in postverbal contexts. However, the examples that are claimed to be a result of closest conjunct agreement in postverbal contexts, as in (1a) from Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (B/C/S), could potentially be analysed as clausal ellipsis, as in (1b):…”
Section: Phrasal or Clausal Conjunction? -Postverbal Conjoined Subjec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some previous experimental work on agreement strategies in South Slavic languages (see Willer-Gold et al 2016;Čordalija et al 2016), it was demonstrated that the closest conjunct agreement (CCA) is the only available strategy for agreement with conjoined NPs in postverbal contexts. However, the examples that are claimed to be a result of closest conjunct agreement in postverbal contexts, as in (1a) from Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (B/C/S), could potentially be analysed as clausal ellipsis, as in (1b):…”
Section: Phrasal or Clausal Conjunction? -Postverbal Conjoined Subjec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slaganje s bližom imenicom u koordiniranom postverbalnom subjektu u bosanskom/hrvatskom/srpskom jeziku: eksperimentalna studija U nekim ranijim radovima o strategijama slaganja predikata s koordiniranim subjektom (vidi Marušič et al 2015, Willer-Gold et al 2016, Čordalija et al 2016, ustanovljeno je da slaganje predikata s bližom imenicom u koordiniranom subjektu jest jedina moguća strategija slaganja kada subjekt slijedi iza predikata. Međutim, primjeri za koje se tvrdi da su rezultat slaganja predikata s bližom imenicom u takvim kontekstima mogli bi se potencijalno analizirati i kao rezultat rečenične elipse.…”
unclassified