2020
DOI: 10.1177/1748048520943696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grammars of contestation and pluralism: Paulo Freire’s action in Brazil’s periphery and the rise of right-wing discourse on YouTube

Abstract: This article examines YouTube videos that feature right-wing discourses from Brazil’s periphery based on perspectives extracted from Paulo Freire’s ideas of action for liberation. The findings from a survey conducted from one year before the 2018 elections until one year later combined with a multimodal discourse analysis have pointed to the formation of a new grammar of contestation that discusses socioeconomic, racial, and gender issues in a discourse identified with the right. The Freirean notion of action … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These are discursive practices that have also been closely linked to xenophobic discourses, such as islamophobia (Farkas et al, 2018; Shooman, 2016) and antisemitism (Allington et al, 2021). Previous qualitative research into deceptive content on YouTube, has explored right-wing extremist communities (Ekman, 2014; Levy, 2020; Lewis, 2018), racist influencers (Johns, 2017; Murthy & Sharma, 2019), populist YouTubers (Finlayson, 2020; Zuk & Zuk, 2020), and conspiracy videos (Allington & Joshi, 2020; Mohammed, 2019; Paolillo, 2018). Critical discourse analysis of YouTube videos have focused on understanding discourses of xenophobia (Asakitikpi & Gadzikwa, 2020), misogyny (Kopytowska, 2021), and racism (Hokka, 2021).…”
Section: Introduction: White Supremacists and Conspiracy Theories On ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are discursive practices that have also been closely linked to xenophobic discourses, such as islamophobia (Farkas et al, 2018; Shooman, 2016) and antisemitism (Allington et al, 2021). Previous qualitative research into deceptive content on YouTube, has explored right-wing extremist communities (Ekman, 2014; Levy, 2020; Lewis, 2018), racist influencers (Johns, 2017; Murthy & Sharma, 2019), populist YouTubers (Finlayson, 2020; Zuk & Zuk, 2020), and conspiracy videos (Allington & Joshi, 2020; Mohammed, 2019; Paolillo, 2018). Critical discourse analysis of YouTube videos have focused on understanding discourses of xenophobia (Asakitikpi & Gadzikwa, 2020), misogyny (Kopytowska, 2021), and racism (Hokka, 2021).…”
Section: Introduction: White Supremacists and Conspiracy Theories On ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suzina (2018) descreveu o Brasil como uma democracia assimétrica porque, além das desigualdades estruturais e históricas, seus cidadãos dificilmente conseguem intervir na (re)definição da ordem social, ou seja, é uma barreira quase impossível de ser ultrapassada por grupos sociais marginalizados. Levy (2020) oferece um exemplo ilustrativo disso, mostrando uma periferia que se cansou de ser (mantida) silenciosa e, assim, desenvolveu gramáticas de contestação para expressar suas reivindicações e opiniões. Embora vindo de circunstâncias muito diferentes, um sentimento semelhante de falta de voz é descrito por Vrydagh e Jiménez-Martínez (2020), que argumentam que a polarização observada no Brasil foi sustentada por percepções, mais do que por diferenças irreconciliáveis.…”
Section: O Global Agora: Criticando O Desenvolvimento Reivindicando Voz Participação E Justiça Socialunclassified